기사 메일전송
US Republican hardliners block House passage of the National Defense Authorization Act by linking it to voter ID legislation
  • Yonhap News
  • July 1, 2026 at 6:00 AM
기사수정
  • Aiming for Senate passage, they are demanding the inclusion of a voter ID law in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), leading to clashes with party leadership.
  • Internal divisions within the Republican Party surface once again amid Trump's demand for 'prioritizing voter ID laws'


미 연방의회 의사당U.S. Capitol Building [Yonhap News file photo]

Hardline Republican members of the U.S. House of Representatives delayed the vote on the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) on the 30th (local time), insisting on the passage of the 'Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act,' which strengthens voter identity verification requirements.


According to Reuters and the congressional news outlet The Hill, the House voted down a procedural rule designed to advance the NDAA, with 198 votes in favor and 224 against.


Fourteen Republican lawmakers joined Democrats in voting against the measure.


The procedural rule introduced that day proposed bundling the SAVE Act and the NDAA into a single legislative package.


The SAVE Act requires proof of citizenship for voter registration and mandates the presentation of a photo ID to vote. While it has passed the House, it remains stalled in the Senate, with little prospect of passage due to Democratic opposition.


Former President Trump, who has frequently alleged the possibility of election fraud, has been pushing for the passage of the SAVE Act ahead of the November midterm elections. Previously, Trump withheld his signature on the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, which had already cleared both chambers of Congress, demanding that the SAVE Act be addressed first.


In response, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) announced the previous day a special legislative procedure to bundle the SAVE Act with the NDAA, aiming to pass both as a single package before sending them to the Senate.


However, hardliners within the party, including Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), argued that the Senate could simply strip the SAVE Act from the package and pass the NDAA alone. They insisted that instead of bundling it, the SAVE Act should be directly incorporated into the body of the NDAA as an amendment.


Bloomberg assessed that the move by a small group of hardline Republicans to put the brakes on Speaker Johnson’s attempt to pass the NDAA once again highlights the divisions within the Republican Party ahead of the midterm elections.


The NDAA is an annual bill that authorizes budget expenditures and policies for the Department of Defense. Once passed by both the House and Senate, the two chambers reconcile differences to create a unified final version, which then undergoes a final vote in each chamber before being sent to the President to be signed into law.


The version of the NDAA passed by the House Armed Services Committee on the 4th includes a provision prohibiting the use of funds for the transition of Wartime Operational Control (OPCON) in a manner that deviates from the plan agreed upon by both South Korea and the United States.


The Senate Armed Services Committee also passed its version of the NDAA on the 11th. The Senate version differs slightly from the House bill, including a provision that restricts budget spending on the OPCON transition process and requires the Secretary of Defense to regularly report the implementation roadmap for the transition to Congress.


What do you think of this article?
recommend
0
great
0
moved
0
정기구독배너
Go to Mobile Site