기사 메일전송
[MAGA vs. Globalism Clash ①] ESG… Globalism's Financial Weapon
  • Kim Young
  • August 18, 2025 at 10:03 AM
기사수정
  • Financial regulation under the guise of environment and ethics
  • A New World Order Created by International Organizations and Capital Elites
  • The flow of money changes the fate of politics
이 기사는 한미일보가 기획한 [MAGA와 글로벌리즘의 충돌] 시리즈의 첫 번째 편입니다. ESG(환경·사회·지배구조)는 기업 경영의 책임성을 강화하는 듯 보이지만, 그 기원은 국제 금융 엘리트와 글로벌 기구가 설계한 새로운 규율 체계였습니다. 표면적으로는 기후변화 대응과 인권, 다양성이라는 보편적 가치를 내세우지만, 실제로는 자본 흐름을 통제하고 정치적 올바름을 강제하는 도구로 기능하고 있습니다. 이번 1편에서는 ESG의 태동과 확산, 그리고 그것이 어떻게 글로벌리즘의 무기가 되었는지를 집중적으로 조망합니다. <편집자 주>

The MAGA slogan clashes with Wall Street's greed. BlackRock and Vanguard are considered the control towers of ESG. Hanmi Ilbo Graphics.

Table of Contents

① ESG… A Financial Weapon of Globalism

② MAGA's Challenge… Not a Trade War, but a Normative War

③ PCism and Elections… How Democracy Was Tamed

④ Election Fraud Discourse… The Cracks in Globalism and Democracy

⑤ Korea's Choice… A Time for Decision Between Two Systems


The three letters ESG have now become an unavoidable norm in the global capital market. The concept, an abbreviation of ‘Environment, Social, and Governance,’ gives the impression that corporations and finance have become aware of their ethical responsibilities. However, upon closer examination of its origins, it becomes clear that this is not merely an ethical awakening but a new set of rules created by the global financial elite. And now, this set of rules, combined with the ideologies of globalism and PCism, has become a weapon determining the fate of nations and corporations.


While the roots of ESG lie in ethical investing (SRI) and the environmental movement of the late 20th century, the decisive turning point was the 2004 report 'Who Cares Wins,' spearheaded by the UN Global Compact. This report was drafted with the participation of major financial institutions such as Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, and Credit Suisse, and it officially coined the term ESG. In 2006, the UN-led Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) was launched, with the world's largest pension funds and investment banks joining. From that moment on, ESG transformed from a mere voluntary corporate guideline into a global rule that controls capital markets.


On the surface, ESG appears benevolent. Few would disagree with the calls to prevent environmental destruction, respect minority rights, and ensure transparent corporate governance. However, this norm is far from neutral. The authority to determine what constitutes an environmentally friendly industry, which social values should be prioritized, and which governance model is ideal has ultimately become concentrated in the hands of international organizations, global rating agencies, and large asset management firms. By assigning ESG scores and allocating funds, mega-financial firms like BlackRock and Vanguard have effectively gained the power of life and death over global corporations.


This is where PCism intervenes. The 'S' in ESG extends beyond simple working conditions or safety issues to encompass diversity, gender equality, and the inclusion of minorities. These were originally values of social movements, but as they became institutionalized within the ESG investment norm, a structure was formed where ‘political correctness’ is enforced in the market. If a company is rooted in traditional values or adheres to specific cultural norms, it is immediately branded as ‘outdated’ or ‘unfit for investment.’ This has expanded beyond the economic sphere into political and cultural discipline.


Furthermore, ESG has been a perfect partner to globalism. Under the guise of universal values presented by international organizations, national governments have been compelled to prioritize ESG compliance over their own industrial policies. The European Union has legally bound corporations and countries through measures like the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), while the United States, under the Democratic administration, has also sought to regulate companies through SEC disclosure rules. In essence, regardless of the choices a nation's democracy makes, it faces exclusion from the market if it does not conform to global norms.


The problem is that these norms are not applied equitably. Western companies face increased costs and weakened competitiveness due to strict adherence to ESG regulations. Meanwhile, China, by only nominally accepting ESG, erodes markets with cheap energy and state subsidies. Ironically, the ‘universal norms’ championed by globalism have become a shackles for developed country corporations and have resulted in increased price competitiveness for Chinese companies. This demonstrates that ESG, under the guise of a norm, is operating as a tool that benefits a specific faction.


Korea is not exempt from this framework either. While the Democratic Party administration actively embraced the 'Green New Deal' and ESG initiatives, businesses on the ground are pleading with dual and triple regulations and cost burdens. Key industries such as steel, petrochemicals, and batteries, in particular, must simultaneously respond to the EU's CBAM, the US's IRA, and China's low-price offensive. ESG is no longer just a matter of corporate management but has become a political norm that dictates national industrial strategy and the autonomy of democracy.


To summarize all these processes, ESG is a new financial weapon that champions environment, human rights, and diversity. Those who wield this weapon are the international financial elite, who, by combining globalism and PCism, discipline nations and corporations. ESG is no longer a mere investment trend but a mechanism that even restricts political choices. And the resistance to this structure began with Trump's MAGA.



Glossary of Key Terms


ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance): Principles for making corporate and investment decisions considering environment, society, and governance. First formalized in a UN report in 2004.


UN PRI (Principles for Responsible Investment): The UN's Principles for Responsible Investment, launched in 2006. A global network of pension funds and asset managers worldwide.


CBAM (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism): The EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. Imposes costs on carbon-intensive imports such as steel and cement based on carbon emissions during production.


CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive): The EU's Sustainability Reporting Directive. A regulation that mandates large companies to disclose ESG-related data.


PCism (Political Correctness): Social and cultural norms emphasizing diversity, minority rights, and gender equality.


Globalism: A tendency of thought and policy that prioritizes international organizations and borderless market order over nation-states.


BlackRock: The world's largest asset management company. Considered a key player in the spread of ESG investing and disclosure norms.



#ESG #MAGA #Globalism #PCism #FinancialElite #ElectionFraud #CarbonRegulation #Korea'sChoice #InternationalPolitics #HanmiIlbo #BlackRock



관련기사
What do you think of this article?
recommend
0
great
0
moved
0

This article has 1comments.

  • Profile
    jigtk2025-08-18 10:28:09

    자본시장 을 부정하는 자들은 북으로 가던지 중공 으로 떠나라

정기구독배너
Go to Mobile Site