기사 메일전송
Park Soo-hyun’s ‘Choi Min-hee Shield’ faces backlash for double standards
  • Kim Young
  • October 29, 2025 at 10:35 AM
기사수정
  • "Let him who is without sin among you cast the first stone"...Ruling party spokesperson cites Bible
  • “Not just the Anti-Graft Act, but also gift tax is under review”… Legal debate expands

  • "Hwang Kyo-ahn's search and seizure with a single line of text" brings political fairness under scrutiny.
국정감사 기간에 열린 최민희 더불어민주당 의원의 딸 결혼식이 피감기관 축의금 논란으로 번졌다. 그런데 같은 당 박수현 수석대변인이 “너희 중 죄 없는 자가 먼저 돌로 쳐라”는 성경 구절로 두둔하면서, 논란은 법과 도덕을 넘어 여론의 격랑으로 번지고 있다. 한미일보는 이번 사안을 청탁금지법·증여세·형평성 세 측면에서 분석했다. <편집자 주>

Park Soo-hyun's ‘Choi Min-hee Shield’ Backfires with Hypocrisy, Politician Faces Public Outcry Amidst Dual Standards. Hanmi Ilbo Graphic

As the controversy surrounding wedding congratulatory money for the daughter of Choi Min-hee, chairwoman of the National Assembly's Science, Technology, Information, and Broadcasting Committee of the Democratic Party, escalates, Park Soo-hyun, the party's chief spokesperson, defended Rep. Choi on the 28th by quoting a biblical verse: "Let him who is without sin among you cast the first stone." However, public opinion has reacted with a chorus of "throwing fuel on the fire."

 

On the same day, Chief Spokesperson Park posted on Facebook, "Isn't it enough now?" and suggested, "Anyone can make a mistake." He quoted John 8:7, writing, "Let him who is without sin among you cast the first stone." However, criticism continues to mount that he is attempting to shield a public official's financial controversy with religious rhetoric.

 

Previously, Rep. Choi's daughter held her wedding ceremony at Sarangjae in the National Assembly on October 18th, during the parliamentary audit period. The mobile invitation included a feature for credit card payment of congratulatory money, and the controversy intensified when it was revealed that congratulatory money and flower wreaths were received from institutions under the committee's oversight. On the 26th, criticism reignited when Rep. Choi was spotted in the plenary session hall reviewing a 'list of congratulatory money' received from her aides. Rep. Choi's side explained, "It was a measure to return the congratulatory money received from institutions," but the People Power Party demanded her resignation, calling it "a clear conflict of interest."

 

Online public opinion exploded. One netizen (sung****) criticized, "Thieves only abound in a den of thieves," and called the attitude of the Democratic Party "the true face of a party that thinks laws can be changed if something is a crime." Another user (lym6****) directly stated, "Soo-hyun, don't quote the Bible carelessly. You'll end up covered in filth." Comments such as "If you had no intention of accepting it, you shouldn't have accepted it in the first place" (c****) and "The people are without sin. The people will strike you down with stones" (wjdr****) followed, showing an overwhelming wave of public anger.

 

However, this issue is not merely a controversy over a violation of the Improper Solicitation and Graft Act.


Legally, taxation and criminal liability vary depending on whose income the congratulatory money is considered. According to a legal interpretation by the National Tax Service, if congratulatory money at a wedding is collected based on the social connections of the hosts, i.e., the parents, the money is considered the parents' property. If the parents transfer the received congratulatory money to their children, it is regarded as a gift. The Inheritance and Gift Tax Act imposes taxes if more than 50 million won is gifted to a child over a 10-year period. Therefore, it has been pointed out that if the amount collected at Rep. Choi's daughter's wedding exceeded a certain standard, it could be subject to gift tax.

 

Even if the wedding is organized in the child's name, the general legal principle is that if guests recognized that the host is a member of the National Assembly and gave congratulatory money, the actual ownership rests with the parents. In fact, the Supreme Court ruled in a 2006 decision that "if wedding congratulatory money is received based on the social standing of the host, it is considered the parents' property, not the child's income."


Consequently, this controversy opens the door not only to exceeding the '50,000 won limit' of the Improper Solicitation and Graft Act but also to the possibility of gift tax evasion and concealment of assets. Ultimately, legal disputes can only be resolved by disclosing the actual amount of congratulatory money exchanged, who managed it, and where it was returned.

 

Some in the political sphere are also raising issues of fairness.


Hwang Kyo-ahn, leader of the Freedom and Innovation Party, was subjected to search and seizure on charges of inciting rebellion solely for posting a single line on social media on December 4th of last year: "Arrest Speaker Woo Won-shik." In contrast, the criticism is fierce that the attitude of protecting a ruling party lawmaker suspected of receiving money from an oversight institution by saying, "Let the sinless cast stones," undermines the fairness of the law and constitutes a double standard.


Ultimately, this incident is not just a personal transgression by a member of the National Assembly, but a test of how far the ethical sensitivity and legal accountability structure of public service have collapsed.

 

#ParkSooHyun #ChoiMinHee #CongratulatoryMoneyControversy #ImproperSolicitationAct #GiftTax #HostResponsibility #Hypocrisy #HwangKyoAhn #PublicOpinionBacklash #HanmiIlbo

What do you think of this article?
recommend
0
great
0
moved
0

This article has 2comments.

  • Profile
    guest2025-10-29 14:00:06

    북한의 주체사상도 기독교 교리에 접합해 만들고 5호통감제또한 교회의 구역나눠 관리하는 방법으로 통제중이다 한국의 수장 이재명도 교회성도라 하고 영부인 김혜경또한 교회 반주자 였다하며 총리 김민석은 집사란다 그런 사람들이 굿하고 점봐서 흰 옷입고 외부행사 나가고 그러는데 과연 교인이면 무속신앙 섬기고 유물론 공산주의를 신봉하는 중국과 맥을 같이 할 수 있나??게다가 정의에 어긋난 일에 성경구절을 둘러대며 죄없는자 최정심을 추궁해보라니?? 한국은 이미 정치권 꼭대기까지 종북좌파가 장악했고 구더기들이 드글거리는 썩은 나라가 된 것이다 이 부란된 썩은 나라를 어찌할까

  • Profile
    edoomok2025-10-29 13:31:26

    이시대의 내로남불행태가 도를 넘어 국가공동체존립필요서문제까지 생각해 보아야 할 일같다. 권력을 잡은 한편은 다수국민과 완전한 현실법인식의 반대편에서 법률을 헌고무신짝 취급을 하면서 행패를 부리는 무소불위의 권력을 행사한다.

정기구독배너
Go to Mobile Site