기사 메일전송
[Editorial] The Cowardly First Instance Verdict on Daejang-dong
  • Admin
  • November 1, 2025 at 10:27 AM
기사수정
  • I saw the truth of the structure, but avoided the name of power.
  • Leaving behind the traces of design, the designer erased.
  • The politics of justice that sewed up responsibility by establishing accomplices.

서울중앙지법 형사합의22부(조형우 부장판사)는 2025년 10월 31일 대장동 개발 비리 사건 1심에서 유동규 전 성남도시개발공사 본부장과 김만배 화천대유 대주주에게 각각 징역 8년을 선고했다. 재판부는 “민간업자들은 성남시 수뇌부의 확실한 보장이 필요했다”고 명시하며 성남시의 정치적 개입 가능성을 사실상 인정했지만, 그 수뇌부의 실체를 끝내 특정하지 않았다. 본 사설은 그 침묵을 사법적 중립이 아니라 정치적 회피로 본다. <편집자 주>

The empty defendant's seat, a place for remaining responsibility. The court punished the co-conspirators, but the designer remains outside the courtroom. Hanmi Ilbo Graphics

The first-instance ruling on the Daejang-dong case shows what happens when the law speaks only half the truth. The court characterized this case as a series of corruption crimes conducted through prolonged provision of money and collusion. That judgment itself was clear. It acknowledged that the project structure was designed from the outset for the benefit of private entities and that the decision to grant only fixed profits and delete the excess profit recoupment clause by Seongnam Urban Development Corporation was an intentional one. In other words, the embezzlement in Daejang-dong was not an administrative error but the result of an intentional design.

 

However, the ruling stopped short of identifying the subject of that intention. The court stated that private developers needed firm assurances from Seongnam City's leadership to proceed with the project, but it did not reveal who that leadership was. Although the fact that direct reports were made to then-Mayor Lee Jae-myung appeared in various parts of the ruling, the law ignored the political weight of those reports. The law saw the structure but erased the names of the hands that created it.

 

The court found Yoo Dong-gyu and Kim Man-bae to be accomplices. It designated the insider with public decision-making power and the private profit-seeker as 'co-designers,' sentencing both to 8 years in prison. This means that those who used public power and those who bought that power were treated as having committed the same level of crime. However, the law on bribery is clear: the recipient of a bribe is more heavily culpable than the giver. Despite this, the court sealed the public official's betrayal and the private entity's greed as symmetrical crimes. This was a dangerous compromise by the judiciary, reducing the corruption of public authority to the same level as private greed.

 

The court stated that it could not clearly calculate the 400 billion won in damages presented by the prosecution, thus negating embezzlement under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment of Specific Economic Crimes and only acknowledging embezzlement under the Criminal Act. This lowered the severity of punishment despite acknowledging intent and structure. By only accepting half of the truth, the law rendered itself powerless. While noting that there were assurances from the leadership, it limited the responsibility to Yoo Dong-gyu's practical actions, ultimately pushing the political decision-maker, who was at the center of this case, out of the spotlight of the judiciary.

 

Yoo Dong-gyu was not the mayor. He was the practical head of the corporation invested in by Seongnam City and an intermediate manager executing public decisions. Despite this, the court shifted all criminal responsibility for the Daejang-dong development, a pledge of the mayor, onto him. The court's silence reduced structural embezzlement within the public service to individual greed, and the blade of justice stopped at the shoulders of a subordinate official, not at the seat of power.

 

This ruling is by no means neutral. The court, in an attempt to balance both sides of political pressure, missed the core of the truth. While hinting at higher-ups with the phrase 'Seongnam City leadership,' it avoided naming them and, to fill that vacuum, linked Yoo Dong-gyu and Kim Man-bae as co-conspirators. This structure was not a victory for justice but a redistribution of responsibility. The politics of the judiciary, which sealed responsibility by creating accomplices, is the reality of this ruling.

 

The Daejang-dong case is not over. With this ruling, the court revealed the truth of the structure, but the truth of power still remains. If the intentional design was acknowledged, the approver of the design must also be revealed. If the law itself conceals half of the truth, it is politics, not justice. This is precisely why this ruling is cowardly. The law knew the truth, but it did not tell the whole truth until the end.

 


#DaejangDong #LeeJaeMyung #YooDongGyu #KimManBae #CowardlyRuling #IntentionalDesign #CoConspirators #Leadership #JudicialPolitics #HanmiIlboEditorial



관련기사
What do you think of this article?
recommend
0
great
0
moved
0

This article has 4comments.

  • Profile
    hursan72025-11-02 09:33:57

    겁많고 눈치보는 재판부가 짜이밍이 미워하는 유동규를 가볍게 선고하면 해코지 당할가봐
    유동규를 끼워넣어 중형을 때린게다,유동규는 양심적으로 대장동 일당의 범죄를 정직하게
    고백하고 재판에 적극 협조했다는데 상식을 넘어 억울하게 희생당했다,앞으로 2심에서는
    양심있는 재판부의 파격적인 감형을 할것을 국민들은 기대하고있다,

  • Profile
    guest2025-11-02 06:13:57

    몸통은 어디 모셔 두고 꼬랑지만 줘 패냐

  • Profile
    guest2025-11-01 14:13:57

    일제시대에도 민족지로 남았던 조선, 동아일보가 반국가세력들과 작당하고 부역하는 이 시대에 한미일보와 스카이데일리를 응원합니다 멸공!

  • Profile
    guest2025-11-01 14:10:27

    대한민국
    사법부는 죽은 법을 다루는 판새들이 모인 곳,
    언론사는 중국돈 먹고사는 언롱꾼들이 모인 곳,
    검찰청 경찰서는 중국공안 인지 정체불명자들이 모인곳,
    대통령,총리,장관들은 전과자들이 모여 작당하는곳
    아니냐?  멸공!

정기구독배너
Go to Mobile Site