기사 메일전송
[Korea-US-Japan Daily In-depth Planning – ❶] A Society Consuming Death... Andong Dam Corpse Bodies
  • Kim Young
  • July 22, 2025 at 1:53 PM
기사수정
  • The body is silent, but we have added too many words.
  • Auditory hallucinations and causal illusions, imagination and distortion surrounding death
  • Rendered truth, consumed death, a society clicking on the deceased
15년 만에 떠오른 안동댐 시신은 과학적으로 ‘시랍화’된 상태였습니다. 경찰은 자연사로 결론지었고 유족은 조용히 장례를 마쳤습니다. 그러나 온라인에서는 미신, 환청, 정치적 음모론이 난무했습니다. 이번 편은 죽음은 무엇인가. 그리고 우리는 그 죽음을 어디까지 이야기할 권리가 있는가를 살펴보고, 이 사건을 둘러싼 사회적 프레임이 어떻게 ‘감정의 정치화’를 거쳐 ‘죽음을 소비하는 구조’로까지 이어졌는지를 추적합니다.<편집자 주>

Andong Dam. Gyeongbuk Province website

The Mummified Body in Andong Dam, Conspiracy Theories, and the Shadow of Human Psychology

 

Table of Contents

1. The Mummified Body in Andong Dam, Conspiracy Theories, and the Shadow of Human Psychology

2. The 10th Anniversary of the Sewol Ferry Disaster: When Memory Transforms from a Right to Power

3. The Institutionalization of May 18th Memorials: Is State-Defined Truth True Truth?


 

In mid-May 2025, a body was discovered at a depth of 30 meters in the muddy bottom of the Andong Dam in Gyeongbuk Province. DNA identification confirmed it was Mr. A, the vice-principal of Y Middle School in Andong, who went missing near the dam in August 2010. The body was mummified, with parts of the head and limbs missing. Based on the National Forensic Service's findings, the police concluded the case, stating, "There are no indications of foul play."

 

However, the case did not end there. A former rescue team leader who participated in the recovery operation testified to hearing auditory hallucinations, saying, "Hey, take me with you." Some media outlets quoted this statement directly, and on social media, superstitious interpretations such as "the deceased themselves guided the discovery" spread instantaneously. YouTube channels linked this body to political events, claiming, "The truth that the administration had been hiding has been revealed."

 

One narrative, in particular, has become strongly entrenched online: the connection to former US Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice, Morse Tan. Some online communities and YouTube content claimed that this body was discovered after Morse Tan mentioned human rights abuses and hidden truths in South Korea.

 

However, the facts are the opposite. Mr. A's body was recovered on May 15th, Morse Tan attended a press conference for the KCPAC International Election Monitoring Group on May 27th, and his substantive remarks regarding election irregularities began after his arrival in Korea on July 15th. Despite this, an inverted causal narrative of "Morse Tan's remarks → body discovery" was disseminated online as if it were fact.

 

This is a prime example of cognitive bias, specifically illusory correlation, as described in forensic psychology. Illusory correlation is a human psychological phenomenon where two unrelated events, when occurring close in time, are mistakenly perceived as cause and effect. This error often occurs when the sequence between the body's discovery and Tan's remarks is confused, or when people attempt to create a cognitively meaningful link.

 

Forensically, this case is evaluated as a typical example of mummification. The 30-meter depth of Andong Dam maintains a water temperature of around 6 degrees Celsius year-round and is covered by a thick layer of anaerobic mud. This environment inhibits decomposition and promotes the solidification of fatty tissues into a wax-like substance, leading to mummification. The body can remain submerged for extended periods without gas formation or buoyancy, exhibiting a pattern where the torso is preserved while limbs are lost.

 

The phenomenon of scientifically explainable deaths being overlaid with superstitious imagination and conspiracy theories is not uncommon. Experts explain that such reactions also stem from humanity's desire for interpretation. Death is silent and offers no explanation. People want to fill that void with stories. Sometimes religion, sometimes politics, and sometimes YouTube algorithms provide these narratives.

 

The problem is that these stories become a means of obscuring the truth. While "auditory hallucinations" can be a subjective experience of the rescuer, reporting them as the cause of the body's recovery is contrary to fact. The framing that connects Morse Tan's remarks and the body's discovery by altering their temporal sequence is closer to a product of the desire for emotional connection than to fact-based criticism or allegations. The suffering of the bereaved family is disregarded, and death is consumed once again.

 

What the mummified body speaks is silence. Yet, people have built illusions, suspicions, and beliefs upon that silence. Thus, the death of a human has become content for YouTube, a tool for online communities, and fodder for political disputes. Death is no longer consumed as a "quiet departure" but as a "signal to be interpreted."

 

We are currently living in an era where death is read through emotion rather than science, and judged by imagination rather than evidence. The deceased's time is filled with the language of conspiracy theorists, and the family's silence is drowned out by the clamor for clicks. This is all the more dangerous because it is packaged in the name of truth.

 

Speaking about death may be the responsibility of the media. However, being vigilant against the desire to interpret death must also be the media's last conscience.

 

Now, we are left with one question to face:

What is death? And to what extent do we have the right to speak of that death?

 


#AndongDamMummy #MorseTan #CognitiveBias #IllusoryCorrelation #ForensicMedicine #DeathAndPsychology #ConspiracyTheoryDebunked #KoreaUSJapanBriefing #SocietyConsumingDeath #Mummification



관련기사
What do you think of this article?
recommend
0
great
0
moved
0

This article has 2comments.

  • Profile
    ilovejesus2025-07-24 13:06:39

    앞서 이 법률은 2021년 6월 한 차례 헌법불합치 결정을 받은 바 있다. 이때는 소년부 재판에서 불처분 결정을 받았던 사람이 14년이 흘러 수사자료 삭제를 신청했다가 거부당한 게 배경이 됐다. 당시 헌재는 “법원에서 불처분결정을 하는 경우 소년의 장래 신상에 불이익을 주지 않아야 한다”며 이 법이 과잉금지원칙을 위반한다고 봤다. [출처:중앙일보] https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/25263151
    14년 전 이재명

  • Profile
    isunpark2025-07-23 15:59:43

    추리를 한번해보자면... 저는 이렇게 추측합니다. 먼저 남교감님이 특수학교에 몸담고있었다면 살해된 여자아이의 담임이나 당시 교감이었을것 같고 재명이는 그여학생을 집단 강X살X하여 소년원에 수감되었을것입니다.그러니 그사건을 가장 잘아는 위치에 있었겠죠. 그러니 재명이를 성남시장 경기지사 대통령으로 만들어야하는 중공이 삼합회를 시켜 입막음한게 아닌가...

정기구독배너
Go to Mobile Site