기사 메일전송
‘Delay in election litigation’ Chief Justice disciplinary action requested… Judicial distrust reignited
  • Hur Kyoum
  • January 3, 2026 at 7:00 PM
기사수정
  • "Election litigation is a matter of high public interest... the longer it is delayed, the more judicial trust collapses."


A disciplinary complaint against Supreme Court justices has been filed with the Supreme Court. The photo on the right shows Wi Geum-suk, Chairperson of the Free Korea Party's Special Committee on Election Irregularities.

A disciplinary complaint has been officially filed against the Supreme Court justices responsible for election nullification lawsuits for the presidential and parliamentary elections, as the cases have significantly exceeded the 180-day statutory processing deadline stipulated in the Public Official Election Act.


According to the New Party for Free Korea (led by former Prime Minister Hwang Kyo-ahn) on the 3rd, the party's Special Committee on Election Irregularities Reform (chaired by Dr. Wi Geum-suk) submitted a formal disciplinary complaint to the Supreme Court on the 26th of last month against six justices, including Supreme Court Justice Roh Kyung-pil.


The Special Committee on Election Irregularities Reform pointed out that the election nullification lawsuit filed on June 23rd of last year has not yet been ruled upon as of January 3rd of this year, constituting a serious violation of Article 225 of the Public Official Election Act.


They argued, "This prolonged inaction goes beyond simple procedural delays and constitutes a violation of official duties under Article 2, Subparagraph 1 of the Act on the Disciplinary Punishment of Judges, and an act that impairs the dignity of a judge under Article 2, Subparagraph 2 of the same Act," requesting the Judge Disciplinary Committee to conduct a thorough investigation and render a stern disciplinary decision.


Specifically, the special committee officially requested the Judge Disciplinary Committee to: commence disciplinary investigations, thoroughly investigate whether the respondents have neglected their duties and violated their obligations, render a severe disciplinary resolution based on the investigation results, and revise internal guidelines to strengthen the Supreme Court Chief Justice's principle of prioritizing the review of election lawsuits.


Chairperson Wi Geum-suk emphasized, "Election nullification lawsuits are highly public interest cases directly linked to a nation's democratic legitimacy. The longer the rulings are delayed, the more rapidly public trust in the judiciary collapses, and it raises suspicions that the judiciary is infringing upon the rights of the people due to political considerations or organizational complacency."


The legal grounds for this disciplinary complaint include: Article 225 of the Public Official Election Act (obligation to process election lawsuits within 180 days), Articles 27(1) and (3) of the Constitution (right to seek judicial recourse and right to a speedy trial), Articles 1 and 3 of the Code of Judicial Ethics, and Article 2, Subparagraphs 1 (violation of official duties) and 2 (act impairing dignity) of the Act on the Disciplinary Punishment of Judges.


The following is the list of Supreme Court justices subject to this disciplinary complaint.


△Supreme Court Justice Roh Kyung-pil △Supreme Court Justice Lee Heung-gu △Supreme Court Justice Oh Seok-jun △Supreme Court Justice Lee Suk-yeon (all for the June 3rd Presidential Election Nullification Lawsuit)

△Supreme Court Justice Seo Kyung-hwan △Supreme Court Justice Shin Suk-hee △Supreme Court Justice Roh Kyung-pil (all for the April 10th General Election Nullification Lawsuit)

What do you think of this article?
recommend
0
great
0
moved
0

This article has 2comments.

  • Profile
    guest2026-01-04 10:00:36

    사법부는 자유민주주의가 거의 다 무너지고 독재체제가 된 현 상황에 대하여 책임이 크며 역사적 심판을 받아야 한다

  • Profile
    guest2026-01-03 23:58:09

    전과4범당은 애국자는 모두 구속했다고 봅니다만, 황교안대표는 구속당시 쇼에 가까웠고 명분도 1년전 sns내용이었다는게 의아했는데 석방된것도 의아합니다. 윤카는 3.800명을 기저귀채워서 총을 쏴서라고 끌고오라고 했던것들인데요. 무튼 황교안대표는 석방이후 전국 당협위원장 임명등의 활동도 분주해졌고, 라이브의 동접자도 훨씬 많아졌어요. 더이상 가발이, 덕수, 문수, 혜훈이 김상욱이 같은것들이 없길 바라는마음으로 지켜봅니다.

정기구독배너
Go to Mobile Site