기사 메일전송
“The three judicial reform bills are absurd, draconian laws… Even the president must be subject to trial.”
  • Lim Yo-hee
  • February 28, 2026 at 12:27 PM
기사수정
  • “If the judicial distortion law turns the three-tier court system into a four-tier system, only the wealthy will win.”

On the 27th, the Citizens' Coalition for People’s Livelihood and youth organizations held a rally in front of the Supreme Court in Seocho-gu, Seoul, to denounce the National Assembly's passage of the "Law Distortion Act" and to urge a speedy trial for Lee Jae-myung. [Photo = CCPL] 

Civic groups and youth organizations held a rally in front of the Supreme Court in Seocho-gu, Seoul, to denounce the National Assembly's passage of the "Law Distortion Act" and call for a trial for Lee Jae-myung. 

 

The Citizens' Coalition for People’s Livelihood (CCPL, Secretary-General Kim Soon-hwan) and the Lawyers for the Common People (LCP), along with 12 young people, held a press conference in front of the Supreme Court in Seocho-gu, Seoul, on the 27th, asserting that the "Law Distortion Act" is a "preposterous evil law."

 

Kim Soon-hwan, Secretary-General of the CCPL, pointed out, "Among the three judicial reform bills, the Law Distortion Act could effectively turn the current three-tier court system into a four-tier system when applied," adding, "Ultimately, it will lead to wealthy individuals who can afford legal fees winning, which will further exacerbate the plight of ordinary people."

 

After the press conference, the CCPL and other groups delivered an appeal containing these concerns to the Supreme Court.

 

Previously, the National Assembly passed a revision to the Criminal Act (the Law Distortion Act) at a plenary session the day before. The act stipulates that judges involved in criminal trials and prosecutors who initiate or maintain public prosecutions may face up to 10 years in prison or suspension of qualifications if they distort the law in criminal cases.

 

The Law Distortion Act is one of the three judicial reform bills pushed by the Democratic Party; other measures, including the introduction of constitutional complaints against court rulings and the expansion of the number of Supreme Court Justices, are also expected to pass the plenary session.


CCPL Donation Account: Korea Post 010108-01-014472 

Account Holder: Citizens' Coalition for People’s Livelihood 

 

“With one’s hand on one’s conscience…”. [Photo = Yonhap News]

Reporter Lim Yo-hee


관련기사
What do you think of this article?
recommend
0
great
0
moved
0

This article has 1comments.

  • Profile
    guest2026-02-28 22:55:46

    1. 대법관 증원은 헌법대로 대법원판사를 임명해서 대법원장과 법원행정처장을 제외한 대법관 1명당 대법원판사 2명씩 소재판부 12개를 구성하면 업무적체를 해소하고 재판업무의 전문화도 가능.

    2. 재판소원은 재판 자체가 실체적 진실이 아니라 절차적 진실을 찾아가는 과정이라는 소송의 한계를 감안하면 4심제가 3심제에 비해 실체적 진실에 가까이 갈 수 있다는 보장이 없는 이상 현행 3심제 아래에서 절차적 정의를 구현할 수 없는 경우 예외적이긴 하지만 재심을 통해 재판소원이라는 사실상 4심제를 도입하여 이루려는 정의의 상당부분은 감당할 수 있으며, 4심제인 재판소원을 감당할 만큼 헌법재판소의 인적•물적 자원이 부족한 현실과 그에 따른 비용을 추가로 소송당사자에게 지우는 것은 경제적 약자에게 지나친 불평등을 초래할 수 있으므로 우리 현실상 불합리한 제도.

    3. 법왜곡죄는 판사나 검사의 직무와 관련하여 기존의 직권남용죄에 해당하지 않는 영역까지 처벌하려는 의도라면 독재를 위한 악법일 뿐.

정기구독배너
Go to Mobile Site