기사 메일전송
NATO Secretary General "22 countries including South Korea and Japan unite for Strait of Hormuz opening... will implement when the time comes"
  • Yonhap News
  • March 23, 2026 at 6:00 AM
기사수정
  • "We will gather after the 19th to answer 'what, when, and where is needed' to open the strait."
  • Supporting US attack on Iran while mentioning North Korea's nuclear issue... "North Korea possesses nuclear capabilities as negotiations have dragged on too long"


NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg meets with President TrumpNATO Secretary General Stoltenberg meets with President Trump [AP Yonhap News]

Mark Rutte, Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), announced on the 22nd (local time) that NATO member states and allies such as South Korea and Japan would rally to reopen passage through the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has effectively blockaded.


Speaking on Fox News, Secretary General Rutte emphasized that "The good news is that a group of 22 countries, most of them NATO allies, but also Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, the UAE, Bahrain, etc., came together on Thursday (the 19th) to implement his (U.S. President Donald Trump's) vision to make the Strait of Hormuz free and open as soon as possible."


Rutte stated, "Currently, this group of 22 countries is working with the United States to plan military and other personnel. We are proceeding with what is needed, when it is needed, and how we will do it together, and we will ensure the opening and free navigation of the Strait of Hormuz as soon as the time is right."


In an interview with CBS News, Rutte also said that NATO member states and 22 countries, including South Korea and Japan, "came together to basically answer three questions: what is needed, when is it needed, and where is it needed" to open the Strait of Hormuz since the 19th. He added, "These three questions are now being addressed to respond to President (Trump)'s demand to ensure free navigation through the Strait of Hormuz."


Rutte's remarks can be interpreted as indicating that East Asian allies like South Korea and Japan, along with European and Middle Eastern allies and partners, have gathered or exchanged opinions to meet the U.S. demand.


Regarding President Trump's criticism that NATO's response to a potential conflict with Iran was passive, Rutte said, "I understand the President's frustration that it is taking time, as he felt that Europe and other allies were too slow." He added, "But I ask for his understanding, as each country had to prepare without knowing about (Iran's attack)."


On the 20th, President Trump criticized, "Without the U.S., NATO is a paper tiger," and stated, "They did not want to join the fight to deter a nuclear-armed Iran." He also pointed out that NATO's participation in operations in the Strait of Hormuz is "very easy for them with almost no risk. Cowards," adding, "And we will remember."


Rutte mentioned that he had spoken with President Trump several times recently, and argued, using the example of North Korea, that the U.S. could not help but break the nuclear deal with Iran and launch a preemptive strike to "make the world safe."


He told CBS News, "As we saw with North Korea, if we negotiate for too long, we can miss the point at which it can be resolved. North Korea now possesses nuclear capabilities," adding, "If Iran acquires nuclear capabilities along with its missile capabilities, it will be a direct and existential threat to the stability of Israel, the region, Europe, and the world."


Regarding the analysis that Iran's launch of a ballistic missile with a range of about 4,000 kilometers towards the UK-US joint base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean could put major European cities within range, Rutte said, "They (Iran) are very close to having such capabilities. This is precisely why I feel that the majority of European politicians sympathize with what the President is doing here (in Iran)."


What do you think of this article?
recommend
0
great
0
moved
0

This article has 2comments.

  • Profile
    guest2026-03-24 17:30:40

    거북이들도 칭찬해야 하나? 만사가 다 때가 있는 건데 ㅉㅉ

  • Profile
    guest2026-03-23 07:29:05

    호르무즈 파병은 미국-이란 전 참전을 위한 것이 아니라 호르무즈해협과 페르시아만 인근에서 출발한 우리 유조선과 LNG선이 호르무즈 해협과 페르시아만의 공해에서의 자유항행권과 영해에서의 무해통항권을 행사하여 이란의 무차별 공격에 불구하고 무사히 통과해서 우리 산업과 각 가정에 필요한 에너지를 안정적으로 확보함으로써 지금 단순히 물가상승 원인을 넘어 생존문제로까지 번져가서 시급한 국가안보문제로 급부상한 에너지 확보전쟁에서 승리하기 위함이므로 불가피. 해적을 막기위해 아덴만에 파견했던 청해부대 정도로는 안되고 이지스함을 파견하는 것이 유사시 우리 해군의 피해를 최소화하면서 에너지원을 확보하는데 지장이 없을 것이며 특히 미국과 정보의 공유도 긴요한 조건. 이란의 선별적 통과허용•통과세부과는 자유항행•무해통항 침해.

정기구독배너
Go to Mobile Site