기사 메일전송
Hwang Kyo-ahn, Leader of 'Liberty and Innovation', Sues US State and Treasury Departments, Judge Lee Jin-gwan
  • Lim Yo-hee
  • January 25, 2026 at 7:41 PM
기사수정
  • Han Duck-soo Sentenced in 2023: "Abuse of Judicial Power and Human Rights Violations"
  • "Ignoring election fraud and participating in political purges..."
  • Basis for Global Magnitsky Act... Request for visa denial, etc.

Hwang Kyo-ahn, leader of 'Freedom and Innovation,' filed a complaint against Judge Lee Jin-kwan and others with the U.S. Department of State and Treasury. [Photo: Yonhap News]

Hwang Kyo-ahn, leader of 'Freedom and Innovation,' filed a complaint against Judge Lee Jin-kwan and others with the U.S. Department of State and Treasury.

 

On the 25th, Hwang and the Freedom and Innovation Party announced that they had filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of State and Treasury against three judges: Lee Jin-kwan, the presiding judge at the Seoul Central District Court who sentenced former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo to 23 years in prison and ordered his immediate detention, along with associate judges Yoon Yi-hwan and Lee Jae-jun.

 

The complainants strongly requested that the U.S. deny visas and ban entry to the respondents, freeze their assets in the U.S., and prohibit transactions with them through this complaint.

 

"Abuse of Judicial Procedures Violates Human Rights"… Application of the Global Magnitsky Act

 

In their complaint, Leader Hwang Kyo-ahn and 'Freedom and Innovation' characterized the ruling as "an abuse of judicial power that cooperated with the political purge of the pro-China leftist Lee Jae-myung administration."

 

The basis for the complaint against these judges is Executive Order 13818 of the United States, the 'Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act.' This act empowers the U.S. government to impose sanctions on foreign government officials involved in serious human rights abuses or corruption.

 

The complainants argued that the respondents violated due process by: △breaching the principle of presumed innocence, △imposing an excessive sentence of 23 years, significantly exceeding the prosecution's request of 15 years, and △issuing a coercive detention order against the lawyer.

 

"Ignoring Evidence of Election Irregularities… A Political Verdict Endorsing a 'Fake National Assembly'"

 

In particular, Hwang's side emphasized that the trial ignored the fundamental issue of 'election irregularities.'

 

According to the complaint, the current National Assembly includes many 'fake lawmakers' who were elected through election irregularities, and the judiciary has been reduced to a political tool of the administration established through the impeachment and presidential election led by these individuals.

 

Furthermore, they criticized the court's complete disregard for the evidence of election irregularities submitted by the legal team of former Prime Minister Han, stating that this action denies the people's legitimate right to resist and undermines the foundation of democracy.

 

Leader Hwang stated, "Within South Korea, the entire judiciary has succumbed to political pressure, making it difficult to expect self-correction, thus necessitating international intervention."

 

He added, "The imposition of an extreme penalty on former Prime Minister Han, who has pro-American tendencies, is a grave matter that ultimately weakens the ROK-U.S. alliance and impacts U.S. national security."

 

The complainants expect that sanctions against the respondents will contribute to the restoration of the rule of law in South Korea and the strengthening of judicial independence.

 

This complaint is an expression of Leader Hwang's strong will to put the South Korean judiciary's judgments on trial according to international human rights and rule of law standards, and attention is focused on how the U.S. government will respond to the request for sanctions against current South Korean judges.

 

Meanwhile, the legal basis for this complaint presented by Hwang's side is as follows:

 

1. Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act

 

This act prescribes sanctions against "persons responsible for or complicit in serious human rights abuses or corruption," and specifically, Section 1(a)(ii) designates as targets for sanctions "foreign government officials who are responsible for serious human rights abuses, including the deprivation or limitation of an individual's liberty through the abuse of judicial procedures."

 

2. Section 7031(c) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act

 

This provision mandates the denial of entry for foreign government officials directly responsible for serious human rights abuses.

 

Reporter Im Yo-hee


관련기사
What do you think of this article?
recommend
0
great
0
moved
0

This article has 4comments.

  • Profile
    guest2026-01-26 09:32:17

    이진관같은 찟죄명의 똥개는 대한민국의 암덩어리 개 수준보다 못한놈 사형만이 답

  • Profile
    hursan72026-01-26 05:54:48

    설마했었는데 여기 판새들은 도대체가 자유민주 국가 대한민국 판사들이 맞는지
    도저히 이해할수없다, 대학과 사법시험에서 도대체 뭘 배우길래 정치물만 들어가지고
    공정과 정의는 찾아볼수가 없는 개판들이 그렇게 많은지 정말 욕이 나온다,
    몇시간짜리 탱크도없고 총한번 쏜적없는 빈총뿐인 엉터리 계엄을 국가내란이라며 대통령에
    사형을,총리에 23년형을,이 엉터리 판새들은 국제재판소에서 엄중한 처벌을 해야한다,

  • Profile
    ENSKim33162026-01-26 02:41:01

    김무성, 2 MB, 홍석현.... 박근혜 탄핵 배후 3인방으로 알려졌었다. 사실이 그렇다 치자. 이렇게 되면 삼류 인성의 김무성이야 원래 그런 놈이니까 제쳐놓더라도 자칭 419세대에 박근혜과 같은 당출신으로 박근혜의 전임자 란 이명박과 419 때 발포명령을 내린 혐의로 장면 정권 시절 사형선고를 받았다가 이병철씨의 노력으로 박정희에 의해 사면을 받은 자의 아들인 홍석현이 짜짜꿍이 되어서 박정희의 딸을 생매장하는 주모자가 되었단게 이 무슨 ...
    나중에 김무성의 뒤를 허리를 굽힌 자세로 다소곳이 따라가던 황교안이란 인간과 박근혜는 하나님이 탄핵하신 것이라고 개수작하던 전광훈이란 두 인간이 지금 자칭 보수랍시고 "윤석렬 대신 나는 어떻소?" 하면서 트럼프의 눈도장을 받으려고 안깐힘중인 이세상을 지금 우리는 어떻게 보아야 하노?

  • Profile
    kingyc712026-01-25 22:41:22

    골로 보내야 합니다~~

정기구독배너
Go to Mobile Site