Lawyer Park Ju-hyun, CEO Kim Mi-young, PD Lee Young-don, CEO Jeon Han-gil Appear

"Conspiracy Theory" Election Irregularities Reconfirmed as Subject of Investigation, Not Debate

"Do you believe there's absolutely no value in investigating?" Lee Jun-seok's hesitant response to Kim's surprise question

Did Lee ignore "vote inflation"? Ignorance? ... Revealing the opponent's frustration

Park relayed a current prosecutor's confession: "Pressure came from the Election Commission."

"Out of 100 cases reported by the Election Commission, only one warrant was issued... and even that was suspended."

PD Lee: "Representative Lee Jun-seok misunderstands the law of large numbers."

Rep. Lee also responded, "Fairness and transparency take precedence over efficiency."

Watching a video of an electronic ballot counting machine that wouldn't count, he asked, "Why is this manipulation?"

Jeon Han-gil criticized, "Don't turn a blind eye, look at how much manipulation is happening."

Regarding a video of Lee Jae-myung's ballot being marked 3175 times in a row, he said, "There will be a response of reclassification."

When the Election Commission was criticized, the Democratic Party filed a complaint... Lee Jun-seok agreed, saying, "That's strange."

"A 10-year prison sentence for speaking about fraudulent elections..." Intense criticism of the National Referendum Act amendment bill

PD Lee: "We should abolish electronic ballot counting machines and use manual counting that can be verified by eye."

Lee Jun-seok, leader of the New Reform Party, expressed his willingness to improve the system, acknowledging that the election rule allowing pre-voting administrators' stamps to be printed and affixed is "illegal."

On the evening of the 27th, from 6:10 PM to the early morning of the next day, Lee reached this consensus with lawyer Park Ju-hyun, who was his debate opponent, during the "End of Fraudulent Elections Debate" live-streamed on the YouTube channel "Fan & Mic." He stated his intention to convey his willingness to improve the system by saying, "I will speak to the People Power Party to prevent this from being legislated."

This debate, attended by lawyer Park Ju-hyun, VON CEO Kim Mi-young, PD Lee Young-don, and CEO Jeon Han-gil as debate opponents, is being evaluated as a period and space that clearly demonstrated that the issue of fraudulent elections, which has been dismissed as a "conspiracy theory" in our society, is a subject for investigation and verification, not just debate.

The debate immediately garnered attention from the outset with both sides engaging in a show of force.

CEO Kim Mi-young, who attended the event despite battling cancer, consistently vetoed the list of evidence presented by CEO Jeon Han-gil as proof of fraudulent elections. As the two sides were in a tense standoff, she posed a surprise question: "Based on what has been presented so far, are there no suspicions whatsoever, and is there no value in investigating them? Is there continued absolute trust in the National Election Commission (NEC)?"

When Lee Jun-seok attempted to downplay the issue, stating, "It's not a subject for investigation beyond being a matter of suspicion," and asking, "Who is saying that?" CEO Kim countered with a logical rebuttal, saying, "If counterfeit money is found, an investigation is initiated based on the counterfeit money, not by searching for the person who made it," catching him off guard.

Lee also drew criticism for his apparent lack of knowledge regarding the discrepancy between the voter turnout announced by the NEC and the actual number of voters, the so-called "vote inflation."

He pointed to PD Lee Young-don as his co-partner in the sub-topic and expressed regret, saying, "I find it regrettable that you are counting the people at the polling station to verify it. If only it had been recorded as video." However, his reaction, which seemed to suggest he only belatedly grasped the difference in actual voter numbers, raised concerns as lawyer Park Ju-hyun immediately countered.

Lawyer Park informed Lee that video recordings existed and stated, "The difference between the pre-voting number announced by the NEC and the number secretly filmed by a YouTuber was over 1000 people." She also cited cases where YouTubers were arrested for such matters.

Previously, Mr. Han (YouTube name 'Hameon Dwgetji'), a YouTuber arrested in April last year on charges of installing surveillance cameras at pre-voting stations for the April 10 general election, had revealed in a video that there was a discrepancy of 1147 people between the actual voters and the number announced by election authorities at one polling station in a single day.

In this video, Mr. Han had questioned whether a bank teller counts money by entering "100 sheets" and then counting. He criticized the NEC's method as being no different from a bank teller writing down "98 sheets" beforehand and then counting the money.

Lawyer Park also revealed a confession from a current prosecutor to demonstrate that investigations into suspicions of fraudulent elections have never been conducted properly.

She stated, "When I asked a prosecutor at the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office to investigate the voter rolls, he said, 'The Election Commission won't provide them.' When I demanded a search warrant, he confessed, 'Pressure is coming in.'"

She then presented a case where the police dismissed allegations of forged ballots, such as "cabbage leaf" ballots, as unfounded without even comparing them to the actual image files, even though legal proceedings were pursued to verify their existence. This shocked the viewers.

According to the police's non-prosecution (no charges) reasoning provided by lawyer Park, the Pyeongtaek Police stated, "Unless there is other important evidence that could overturn the parliamentary election invalidation lawsuit, image file confirmation is impossible at this stage (warrant denied)."

The chronic and structural vulnerability of the current system, where a sitting judge concurrently serves as the head of the Election Commission, was also pointed out as a problem leading to courts not issuing warrants in cases of suspected election fraud.

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun criticized the judiciary's lukewarm stance, stating, "Over 100 cases have been reported to the Election Commission, but only one warrant was issued." She also revealed that even in that single case, the police closed the case by "suspending the investigation."

Regarding statistical anomalies, both sides remained unyielding. CEO Jeon Han-gil emphasized that the law of large numbers has no exceptions, while Rep. Lee maintained that "it is possible depending on voting tendencies."

In response, PD Lee Young-don stated, "Representative Lee Jun-seok misunderstands the law of large numbers" and "Representative Lee is making a big mistake," pointing out the loopholes in the current system that fails to properly filter duplicate voting.

When CEO Jeon Han-gil asked, "In elections, is speed more important, or is fairness and transparency more important?" Lee Jun-seok responded, "Of course, it must be fair and transparent," aligning to some extent with Jeon Han-gil's position.

After watching a video of an electronic ballot counting machine that wasn't counting properly, Lee Jun-seok's reaction, "Why is this manipulation?" drew anger.

When lawyer Park Ju-hyun presented a video taken by an observer in Yangcheon-gu of an electronic ballot counting machine and pointed out, "The count for one candidate is not moving at all," Lee's unexpected reaction drew criticism.

CEO Jeon also criticized, "Representative Lee, please look carefully with your own eyes. Don't turn a blind eye to how much the ballot sorting machines are being manipulated. Look with your own eyes."

Lee also drew backlash for his complacent attitude when he watched a video of the 6.3 presidential election showing Lee Jae-myung's name appearing 3175 times consecutively, saying, "Tomorrow, after watching this video, there will be a response that it was reclassified."

Conversely, he expressed agreement, saying, "That's strange," when CEO Jeon Han-gil was criticized by the Democratic Party for criticizing the NEC.

When Jeon Han-gil made heated remarks such as "Even if you call the NEC a criminal organization, they won't be able to refute it," Lee did not strongly refute him but listened attentively.

On this day, Jeon stated, "There is a reason why lawsuits claiming fraudulent elections are 100% lost. When we file a lawsuit, the defendant is the head of the NEC, and the head of the NEC is a judge. They are on the same team as the judiciary," directly targeting the "judge cartel."

The problem of the NEC's rule allowing printed stamps instead of personal seals for pre-voting, which violates Article 158(3) of the Public Official Election Act stipulating that pre-voting must have the administrator's personal seal affixed, similar to same-day voting, was also pointed out.

Furthermore, sharp reactions poured from CEO Jeon Han-gil's side regarding the recent movement by the NEC and the Democratic Party to legislate this rule.

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun questioned, "Why are you considering efficiency? You should be considering transparency and integrity." CEO Kim also emphasized, "If you just stamp the seal, all fraudulent elections will disappear."

When Lee Jun-seok asked, "I will speak to the members of the People Power Party. Let's change it to stamping the seal. Can Representative Jang Dong-hyuk win then?" Lawyer Park replied, "He can win. If you change it to using personal seals," bringing the discussion to a close.

PD Lee Young-don suggested, "To prevent fraudulent election manipulation, the most important method is to revert to the original law, where the pre-voting administrator affixes their personal seal. For same-day voting, too, instead of using the seal provided by the NEC, the administrator should use their personal seal," adding, "This is the most important way to eliminate fraudulent election manipulation."

The panelists also intensely criticized the amendment to the National Referendum Act, which imposes a 10-year prison sentence for speaking about fraudulent elections.

Furthermore, PD Lee argued, "Electronic ballot counting machines must be abolished. If everyone uses manual counting in the old-fashioned way, which is transparent and understandable to everyone and can be verified by eye, all doubts will disappear," emphasizing the need for progressive institutional reform.

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 38] Lawyer Park Ju-hyun: "Fraudulent elections are a matter of our sovereignty and our descendants... It should not become like Venezuela."

28th, 6:04 AM

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun urged attention to fraudulent elections, stating, "It should not become like Venezuela." [Capture from Fan & Mic video]

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun recalled, "When I explained fraudulent elections to Representative Hwang Kyo-ahn in July 2021, he was lukewarm. However, when I showed him the evidence, he began to look closely, saying, 'We must be humble towards evidence.' Then, I suggested going to the recount site, and he visited 4-5 recount sites and personally saw the counterfeit ballots. After that, he said, 'How can I tolerate this injustice I've seen?' and he is now fighting."

She continued, "At first, I also thought there would only be electronic manipulation, but after entering this field, I conducted evidence preservation in about nine locations, including Ansan, and found that offline manipulation is also significant. I realized that the NEC itself has enormous problems. Subsequently, I discovered significant hiring irregularities, and the National Intelligence Service's security inspection results also revealed many issues. In fact, these are just the tip of the iceberg, and the extent of corruption could be beyond our imagination. The reason I had to participate after receiving notice two days ago, despite my physical condition, is that fraudulent elections are a matter that determines our country's future and present."

She added, "If the South Korea my son and daughter will live in becomes a country like Venezuela, Venezuela collapsed due to fraudulent elections, and the Supreme Court prevented the investigation of fraudulent elections, turning it into a country of fraudulent elections. As a result, for its citizens, becoming an exodus, escaping their country and becoming illegal immigrants, is a dream. That rich country has become the poorest and has collapsed due to 27 years of oppression, but our country should not follow that path."

Lawyer Park stated, "I discussed this on my YouTube channel, 'Lawyer Park Ju-hyun TV,' during the March 9 presidential election. The core issue is not 'basket voting.' There were a significant number of counterfeit ballots marked for Lee Jae-myung. Seeing this being distorted and reduced to 'basket voting,' I thought this was a problem. Although you have seen much evidence today, it is still just the tip of the iceberg. The movie 'Why the Cartel' will be broadcast in March, so please watch it. This is a matter of our sovereignty, and it concerns our friends, family, and descendants. Our descendants should not live in a country like Venezuela where escaping their country is a dream. Representative Lee, if your dream is for the citizens of South Korea, please eradicate the problem of fraudulent elections and truly live for South Korea."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 37] Lawyer Park Ju-hyun: "Why did the martial law troops go to Suwon... The arrest rumors were first raised by the Democratic Party."

28th, 5:48 AM

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun listening attentively to Representative Lee Jun-seok's questions about the necessity of A-WEB investigation. [Capture from Fan & Mic video]

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun countered Lee Jun-seok by asking, "Why did the martial law troops go to Suwon?"

She then asked, "You know that the arrest rumors were first mentioned by Yoon Gun-young, Kim Byung-joo, and Park Sun-won of the Democratic Party, right?" Lee responded, "Yes."

She continued, "And why is the A-WEB (Association of World Election Bodies) Seoul Center located there? Also, isn't it true that electronic ballot counting machines through A-WEB have become a breeding ground for fraudulent elections in various countries? And didn't Congolese people come to South Korea and protest to the NEC and A-WEB?"

To this, Lee Jun-seok asked, "What does the NEC gain by exporting fraudulent elections?" and added, "There is a possibility of Wang Huning behind it," reiterating the need for a high-intensity investigation.

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 36] PD Lee Young-don: "Have the administrator's personal seals affixed according to the law... the most important way to eliminate fraudulent manipulation."

28th, 5:11 AM

PD Lee Young-don (right). [Capture from Fan & Mic video]

PD Lee Young-don said, "Representative Lee Jun-seok should understand the reason why we are debating for nearly 7 hours, rather than focusing on individual points. It is about improving the election system."

PD Lee suggested, "To prevent fraudulent election manipulation, the most important method is to revert to the original law, where the pre-voting administrator affixes their personal seal. For same-day voting, too, instead of using the seal provided by the NEC, the administrator should use their personal seal," adding, "This is the most important way to eliminate fraudulent election manipulation."

He added, "Secondly, electronic ballot counting machines must be abolished. Machines that create so many suspicions, like electronic ballot counting machines, are not used in countries like Germany, France, or Canada, even though they conduct pre-voting. If everyone uses manual counting in the old-fashioned way, which is transparent and understandable to everyone and can be verified by eye, all doubts will disappear."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 35] Jeon Han-gil: "Speaking of fraudulent elections results in 10 years in prison... 'It's like killing the doctor who diagnosed the cancer, not improving it.'"

28th, 4:59 AM

CEO Jeon Han-gil. [Capture from Fan & Mic video]

CEO Jeon Han-gil lamented, "It has become a situation where the doctor who diagnosed cancer must be killed. South Korea now imposes a sentence of up to 10 years in prison simply for speaking about fraudulent elections due to the amendment of the National Referendum Act."

He continued, "Gordon Chang, a lawyer and close associate of President Trump, evaluated that South Korea's free voting system is dead, given that the National Referendum Act is being amended to impose a 10-year sentence on those who raise issues. We are desperate today. We believe this is the last hope for South Korea. If early-stage cancer is detected, it must be treated with medication or laser therapy. This is the reality in South Korea, and we are in dire need."

CEO Jeon concluded, "I did not come here to win against Representative Lee today. I came to inform and appeal to the public about the reality."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 34] Lawyer Park Ju-hyun: "When examining the paper, the NEC used 39 companies' roll paper, not just the two contracted companies."

28th, 4:37 AM

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun shared an anecdote about the examination of roll paper.

Lawyer Park said, "As a personal experience, the expression of the NEC's Legal Affairs Division head became gloomy when asked to examine the roll paper. They should have only examined Hansol Paper and Mulim Paper, but the NEC insisted on bringing 39 companies' roll paper for a second examination and comparing all of them," she said.

Lee Jun-seok retorted, "If Mulim and Hansol were not examined, that would be a problem, but what is the problem with examining other papers while examining Mulim and Hansol?"

In response, lawyer Park explained, "The official contractors for the April 15 general election were only Hansol and Mulim. So, it shouldn't be done that way. Because counterfeit ballots have different paper textures," and Lee Jun-seok did not argue further.

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 33] "Identical printing marks found on pre-voting ballots from various regions across the country... Evidence of forgery."

28th, 4:18 AM

When 10 pre-voting ballots from various regions across the country were gathered, identical printing marks were found. Analysis suggests it's more scientific to assume they were forged in large quantities from one place rather than sent from different polling stations. [GIF from video provided by Lawyer Park Ju-hyun]

A revelation was made that identical printing marks found on out-of-area pre-voting ballots from various regions across the country are clear evidence of forgery.

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun, while releasing a video, stated, "Out-of-area pre-voting ballots come from different polling stations across the country, yet 10 ballots show the same phenomenon." She then demonstrated the 10 ballots with black printing marks one by one.

She emphasized, "Although sent from different regions, they exhibit the same phenomenon. Specifically, this is a printing mark, which indicates a counterfeit ballot. Such occurrences are clear evidence of fraudulent elections."

When Lee Jun-seok asked, "Is it like this consecutively?" Lawyer Park replied, "Yes. They are from different regions but show the same phenomenon. In Incheon Yeonseo-eul, six ballots with the same color error came from Jeju, Seoul, and Gwangju."

Previously, during the 22nd General Election (April 10 General Election) in 2024, identical toner-like marks in the same position and shape were found on pre-voting ballots cast from different regions, raising concerns among observers.

At the Daegu Yeungnam University Gymnasium counting center in the early morning of April 11, 2024, observers pointed out marks of identical shape, size, and position (yellow circle) on pre-voting ballots cast from different locations. Provided by informant.

According to the investigation by <한미일보> at the time, an informant reported that during the counting of the 22nd General Election on the morning of the 11th, at the Cheonma Gymnasium of Yeungnam University's College of Engineering in Daegu Metropolitan City, they witnessed pre-voting ballots from different out-of-area voting locations having marks of the same shape, size, and position.

In a phone call with reporters, the informant said, "The voting locations for out-of-area pre-voting were Gohyeon-dong and Soram-myeon, respectively, but the black ink-like marks at the top of the pre-voting ballots were found in almost identical forms. I suspect it was a mark made by the same printer," they reported.

Previously, in October 2021, the year after the 21st General Election (April 15 General Election) in 2020, the so-called "black line ballots" were found during a Supreme Court recount, causing controversy. These ballots, with a prominent black line in the middle, were presumed to be toner marks from a laser printer at the time. Print experts explained that such marks are easily transferred when the printing drum is not clean. At the time, observers and lawyers boycotted the recount due to the emergence of numerous suspected counterfeit ballots.

A "black line ballot" witnessed during the recount of the 4.15 general election in Osan, Gyeonggi Province, in October 2021.

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 32] Lee Jun-seok: "I am aware" of the illegality of the rule delegating the pre-voting administrator's seal... "I will speak to the People Power Party."

28th, 3:41 AM

Lee Jun-seok responded that he is aware of the illegality of the rule allowing pre-voting administrators' seals to be printed and affixed.

When lawyer Park Ju-hyun said, "There is no need for amendment. It should be done according to the current law. The rule itself is illegal," Lee replied, "I am aware."

As requests poured in, such as "You don't need to amend it, just abolish the rule (lawyer Park Ju-hyun)" and "Since you are a member of the National Assembly, please speak up (CEO Jeon Han-gil)," he responded, "As I said earlier, that can be done."

When Lee Jun-seok asked, "If only the seal is stamped, can the conservative camp win?" lawyer Park replied, "Yes, you can win. Try it. Try it this time, and you can win."

When Lee Jun-seok asked again, "I will speak to the members of the People Power Party. Let's change it to stamping the seal. Can Representative Jang Dong-hyuk win then?" lawyer Park replied, "He can win. If you change it to using personal seals."

In response, CEO Jeon Han-gil added, "If you allow the administrator's personal seal to be used, then I will support Representative Lee Jun-seok."

When Lee Jun-seok asked again, "So, if it's manual counting and only the seal is stamped, can the conservative camp unconditionally win the election?" lawyer Park immediately replied, "Yes."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 31] Jeon Han-gil: "Hiring irregularities, bidding irregularities... The NEC is a collective of criminal scum."

28th, 3:23 AM

CEO Jeon Han-gil strongly denouncing the NEC's various corrupt practices. [Capture from Fan & Mic video]

CEO Jeon Han-gil stated, "There are as many as 1200 cases of corruption at the NEC. Kim Se-hwan, Secretary-General of the NEC, his son was called 'the Crown Prince' because the NEC paid for his rent due to fraudulent hiring."

CEO Jeon exclaimed, "From central executives to regional employees, the NEC was a corrupt team. Does this make sense? NEC executives took leave of absence falsely and traveled abroad 70 times. Are they even public officials? They are doing this with the taxes we pay. Isn't the NEC group scum?"

He continued, "Germany uses manual counting entirely due to hacking risks, but we have many errors, and the NEC made suspicious bids. Isn't it common sense to do things with fewer errors? The error rate for the identity verification device used for advance voting is said to be 10%." He lamented, "Is this truly normal? Is it understandable? South Korea is a democratic republic, and the people are sovereign. Look, they choose the machine with the highest error rate for identity verification. That's why even if I call the NEC a criminal organization, they won't be able to refute it."

CEO Jeon stated, "There is a reason why lawsuits claiming fraudulent elections are 100% lost. As I mentioned earlier, when we file a lawsuit, the defendant is the head of the NEC, and the head of the NEC is a judge. They are on the same team as the judiciary. A judge cartel."

Consequently, he lamented, "The Board of Audit and Inspection audited this group of scum, but the NEC filed a lawsuit with the Constitutional Court claiming this was wrong. The Constitutional Court ruled that the Board of Audit and Inspection has no authority to audit, regardless of whether the NEC commits corruption. Why did the Constitutional Court rule in March last year that the NEC should not be audited despite numerous corrupt practices? Because 6 out of the 8 Constitutional Court justices who sought to protect the NEC were former NEC chairpersons. NEC members are judges, Constitutional Court justices are judges, and the judiciary is made up of judges. The judge cartel is so firmly established that even if the NEC is rotten and wastes the people's blood and sweat, the Board of Audit and Inspection cannot audit them because they are all in cahoots."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 30] Lawyer Park Ju-hyun: "A person from King Sunjo of Joseon, 197 years old, is on the voter list."

28th, 2:53 AM

End of Fraudulent Elections Marathon Debate. [Capture from Fan & Mic video]

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun raised an issue, stating, "A person who is 197 years old, from the time of King Sunjo of Joseon, is on the voter list."

When Lee Jun-seok asked, "Isn't it that resident registration statistics have not been properly deleted?" lawyer Park countered, "Then the Ministry of the Interior and Safety's list and the voter list should be the same. Why are there more people on the voter list?"

She continued, "This is ultimately for inflating votes," pointing out the issue.

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 29] Lawyer Park Ju-hyun: "Brick-shaped ballots could never have come out... They are all fake ballots."

28th, 2:25 AM

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun characterized the brick-shaped ballots as "These kinds of ballots cannot appear. They are all fake."

Lawyer Park emphasized, "Pre-voting ballots are roll paper. Because they are circular, when you cut them, they become curved." She then held up actual roll paper and reiterated, "Therefore, these (brick) ballots cannot appear."

She added, "The NEC stated in a broadcast featuring announcer Oh Sang-jin that they use a special material that restores the paper to its original state. However, the NEC ballot contract I obtained does not mention this. Because they come from rolls, they should naturally be elongated (curved)."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 28] Jeon Han-gil: "There is a chip inside the ballot sorting machine (for wireless communication)."

28th, 2:13 AM

Content reported by former National Assembly member Min Kyung-wook from a Han-teul Systems official. [GIF file from Min Kyung-wook's YouTube channel]

Jeon Han-gil raised an issue, stating, "There is a chip inside the ballot sorting machine, inside the laptop."

Jeon stated, "An engineer reported that there is a chip," adding, "This is the case in 17,000 units nationwide."

When Lee Jun-seok questioned this, saying, "You don't know what kind of chip it is, do you?" lawyer Park Ju-hyun revealed, "Former Assembly member Min Kyung-wook received a tip from a Han-teul Systems official that it has communication functionality," and exposed the problems with ballot sorting machines (laptops) equipped with wireless communication capabilities.

<한미일보> understood the situation at the time to be as follows.

In December 2024, former Assembly member Min Kyung-wook stated, "A technician who went to the counting center for pre-election inspection the day before the election pressed 'System Configuration' and found a DNS wireless communication address, and there is testimony that the Wi-Fi function was hidden," adding, "This means that the counting machines are receiving commands from somewhere and sending data."

This claim is actually supported by an online whistleblower testimony that is causing a stir.

According to a video posted by lawyer Park Ju-hyun on social media on the 18th, a technical expert related to Han-teul Systems' ballot sorting machines (electronic ballot counters) revealed in an interview with former Assembly member Min, "The internet cable was not connected to the laptop in the counting machine, and the icon for the Wi-Fi function was hidden to prevent verification." He added, "It can be confirmed through IP configuration."

He further stated, "By checking the laptop, we can verify whether unofficial programs have been installed and whether Wi-Fi used for wireless communication with (Chinese) Huawei relays has been used."

Moreover, he asserted, "The laptop used this time has only one hard disk drive (HDD), and I heard from a Han-teul Systems official that real-time backups are being made somewhere in case of data corruption or system failure when reading and sorting ballots. Therefore, by verifying and checking the laptop, the data transmission path through the relay can be confirmed."

He added, "To know the number of eligible voters in the relevant electoral district indicated on the vote count sheet, wireless communication with the main server is necessary. Therefore, the vote count sheet printed with the number of eligible voters for the electoral district and the ballot sorting machine's wireless communication with the main server are evidence of this."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 27] Lee Jun-seok: "When criticizing the NEC, the Democratic Party filed a complaint. 'That's strange.'"

28th, 1:59 AM

Lee Jun-seok responded, "That's strange," regarding the Democratic Party filing a complaint when the NEC was criticized.

When CEO Jeon Han-gil asked, "Isn't it strange that the Democratic Party filed a complaint against Jeon Han-gil for criticizing the NEC?" Lee replied, "That can be strange."

CEO Jeon stated forcefully, "It's not just 'can be strange,' I consider them to be in cahoots."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 26] Lee Jun-seok, after watching a video of Lee Jae-myung appearing 3175 times in a row: "Tomorrow, they will say it was reclassified."

28th, 1:48 AM

Lee Jun-seok offered a weak explanation, stating it was a reclassification video, after watching a video of the June 3 presidential election showing Lee Jae-myung appearing 3175 times in a row.

When lawyer Park Ju-hyun presented the "shocking video from Goyang-si Deogyang-gu where only Lee Jae-myung appears for 3175 consecutive votes," Lee replied, "Tomorrow, after watching this video, they will say it was reclassified." This elicited protests from the opposing side.

Furthermore, lawyer Park also raised an issue with a photo showing a ballot box added to a polling station storage room in Incheon Michuhol-gu on a different date.

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 25] Lee Jun-seok's reaction, "Why is this manipulation?" after watching a video of an electronic ballot counting machine that wouldn't count, drew criticism.

28th, 1:30 AM

Candidates are cross-voting, but the numbers in the vote aggregation section are not changing. [Video provided by Lawyer Park Ju-hyun]

Lee Jun-seok's reaction, "Why is this manipulation?" after watching a video of an electronic ballot counting machine that wasn't counting properly, drew protests from the opposing side.

When lawyer Park Ju-hyun presented a video taken by an observer in Yangcheon-gu of an electronic ballot counting machine and pointed out, "The count for one candidate is not moving at all," Lee's unexpected reaction drew criticism.

CEO Jeon Han-gil stated, "Representative Lee, please look carefully with your own eyes. Don't turn a blind eye to how much the ballot sorting machines are being manipulated. Look with your own eyes."

When lawyer Park again asked, "If you go and see it, it spins too fast to see, but if you slow it down, you can see it. Is this manipulation or not?" Lee gave this response.

The entire group burst into incredulous laughter. Then, when lawyer Park asked, "Citizens, is this manipulation or not?" Lee Jun-seok responded, "You are continuously talking about the voting procedure, the counting procedure..." and CEO Jeon directly retorted, "Don't change the subject."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 24] Lawyer Park Ju-hyun: "Because the network is connected, it results in incorrect values, like in Suwon Jeong, Gyeonggi Province."

28th, 1:10 AM

[1] 131 and 132 ballots confirmed as valid after re-examination by the review and tabulation department. (Red circle) [2] The NEC did not reflect the re-examined valid ballots in the final tabulation and announced only 10,176 votes for candidate Kim Jun-hyeok and 7,299 for candidate Lee Su-jeong. This is the same as the initial classification by the ballot sorting machine. (Yellow circle) [3] The 263 validly confirmed ballots (131+132) were added to the final invalid ballots of 618 and excluded from the official count. (Blue circle) Source: NEC's official counting results and counting status sheets obtained through informant's information disclosure request.

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun pointed out, "The difference between in-area and out-of-area pre-voting values in the Suwon Jeong constituency, Gyeonggi Province, is because they are manipulated and interconnected."

Lawyer Park explained, "Because the electronic ballot counting machine is linked to the central server, the values that pass through the electronic ballot counting machine should be transmitted, but incorrect values are being entered."

She continued, "The electronic ballot counting machine records the values that pass through it. Therefore, if the electronic ballot counting is linked to the central server, it becomes the value recorded by the central server."

When Lee Jun-seok asked, "Are you saying that the central server sent the already entered values to the electronic ballot counting machine?" lawyer Park replied, "It is possible to send them that way."

When Lee Jun-seok asked again, "Is it that the observers were too busy and missed it, or were they bribed? Which one is it?" lawyer Park said, "It's neither. The observers cannot see the electronic ballot counting machine. In the case of the Superintendent of Education election, they go inside the machine so you can't even check the electronic ballot counting machine."

Furthermore, when lawyer Park asked Lee Jun-seok, "How many times have you observed?" and Lee replied, "I have watched it four times via video," lawyer Park added, "I have personally participated several times."

<한미일보> understood the situation at the time to be as follows.

At the time, concerns were raised that the ballot sorting machine (electronic ballot counting machine) failed to properly filter ballots, and valid ballots manually sorted by election officials were counted as invalid, inevitably leading to a decline in election reliability.

According to the informant's comparative analysis of the official statistics announced by the NEC and the counting status sheets obtained through an information disclosure request, in the Suwon Jeong (Yeongtong-gu) constituency for the 22nd General Election (April 10 General Election), 2,241 valid ballots that were re-examined were all classified as invalid.

According to the NEC's vote counting results for this general election, the number of invalid ballots in Suwon Jeong was 4,696, which was more than the margin of 2,377 votes (1.73 percentage points) between candidates Kim and Lee.

According to the informant, the vote counting status sheet indicated that after re-examination of out-of-area pre-voting ballots, 131 votes were classified as valid for candidate Kim and 132 for candidate Lee after passing through the review and tabulation department.

Therefore, the NEC should have announced the final tally for out-of-area pre-voting as 10,130 votes for candidate Kim and 7,431 for candidate Lee, by adding the re-examined 263 votes (131+132) to the 10,176 votes for candidate Kim and 7,299 votes for candidate Lee initially sorted by the ballot sorting machine.

However, the NEC announced that candidate Kim received 10,176 votes and candidate Lee received 7,299 votes. This only reflected the initial results from the ballot sorting machine, and the re-examined 263 votes (131+132) were excluded.

Instead of being counted as valid, the 263 votes were added to the 355 votes initially classified as invalid, merging into the total of 618 invalid out-of-area votes.

The discovery of such counting errors was not limited to out-of-area pre-voting. According to the informant, 1,018 ballots from same-day voting, 947 from in-area pre-voting, and 13 from overseas absentee voters, totaling 2,241 ballots in Suwon Jeong alone, were classified as invalid.

The assertion that 2,241 valid ballots were included in the total 4,696 invalid ballots announced by the NEC has fueled doubts about the integrity of the election.

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 23] Lee Jun-seok: "I don't care even if the pre-voting administrator's seal is stamped."

28th, 12:59 AM

Lee Jun-seok stated, "If this has an impact on the election, I don't care even if the seal is stamped."

When CEO Jeon Han-gil pointed out, "Article 158(3) of the Public Official Election Act clearly states that pre-voting, like same-day voting, must have the administrator's personal seal affixed. However, for convenience, the election authorities changed the rule to allow the use of a seal provided by the Election Commission instead of the personal seal of the voting administrator, and recently, they are trying to make this rule into law. This is precisely the intention to conduct fraudulent elections. Representative Lee speaks like a spokesperson for the NEC. If there are so many problems, and the public is demanding it, why not propose that the pre-voting ballots be stamped with the administrator's personal seal, just like same-day voting ballots? Instead of prioritizing speed, the public has doubts." Lee responded as stated above.

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 22] Lee Young-don: "Lee Jun-seok is making a big mistake... The same person voted again in advance."

28th, 12:55 AM

PD Lee Young-don stated, "Lee Jun-seok is making a big mistake," and presented a case where the same person voted again in advance.

PD Lee asked, "How does the NEC know if I have voted when I vote in advance and then go somewhere else?"

To this, Lee Jun-seok responded, "I will answer. When you go to vote in advance, you present your ID and they check if the photo matches. If it's issued and recorded, what happens if someone with the same resident registration number, Lee Young-don, tries to vote again elsewhere?"

PD Lee replied, "I don't know (I can't tell). They can vote again." When Lee Jun-seok reacted with "What are you talking about?" he reiterated, "Representative Lee is making a big mistake."

He continued, "There is a case where the same person voted in advance and then voted again 20 minutes later." When Lee Jun-seok asked, "Who is that person?" CEO Jeon Han-gil reacted with agitation, saying, "Who it is is not important. Representative Lee, you are showing facts, so why are you wriggling out like a loach? Why are you asking who it is right now?"

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 21] Jeon Han-gil: "Is efficiency important, or is fairness important?" Lee Jun-seok: "Of course, fairness."

28th, 12:15 AM

CEO Jeon Han-gil (right). [Capture from Fan & Mic video]

Lee Jun-seok stated that fair and transparent voting is more important than fast and swift voting.

When CEO Jeon Han-gil asked, "In elections, is speed more important, or is fairness and transparency more important?" Lee responded, "Of course, it must be fair and transparent."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 20] Lee Young-don: "Manipulation in both the grand scheme and the details... A total election fraud."

27th, 11:59 PM

PD Lee Young-don (right) is speaking. [Capture from Fan & Mic video]

PD Lee Young-don stated, "It is a fraudulent election where the grand scheme is organized and systematic, and vote counts are manipulated. Then, if a lawsuit is filed to verify this, counterfeit ballots are manufactured in China and inserted during the preparation period."

He continued, "It is difficult for anyone in South Korea to verify this. Furthermore, in the detailed aspects, there are mistakes by the NEC, plus partial manipulation, leading to a total election fraud in our country."

He then countered Lee Jun-seok's points by saying, "If you ask me to point out what part is wrong and what part is wrong and present evidence, it will not be a debate. It should be an investigation."

During this process, Lee Jun-seok also revealed his lack of understanding.

Lee Jun-seok said, "What Assembly member Min initially said was to examine the ballot box because something was tampered with. But isn't it that the counting results are also different from the fraudulent voting, so more was added because they were afraid of a recount?"

This was interpreted as asking a question completely unrelated to the panels' unanimous opinion from the beginning of the debate that fraud occurred systematically throughout the entire voting and counting process.

Lee Jun-seok also asked, "What is the reason for taking the cast vote and the counted vote differently? If the voting was manipulated, why manipulate the counting?"

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun replied, "Both voting and counting are manipulated. This is because we don't know how many votes will be cast on the day of voting. The manipulation rate for same-day voting is low or non-existent. Therefore, printed seals should not be used."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 19] Lawyer Park Ju-hyun: "The seal on the ballot box in Yeongdeungpo-eul was changed... They dropped the investigation after I filed a complaint."

27th, 11:40 PM

Photos taken by plaintiff Park Yong-chan (Future United Party) during the evidence preservation procedure in May 2020 (left) and on the day of the Supreme Court recount on August 2021, show differences in the folding angle of the seal and the position of the judge's stamp (about 2cm difference in distance) and size, which are discernible even to the naked eye. Provided by Park Yong-chan.

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun stated, "The seal on the ballot box (at the court storing the ballot boxes) was changed. It is also recorded in the trial transcript. The ballot box stored in the court has been changed."

To this, Lee Jun-seok asked, "Who applied the seal?" and lawyer Park lamented, "A judge applied the seal, but he said he didn't know. I filed a complaint about this, but the investigation was suspended."

At this point, Lee Jun-seok asked lawyer Park again, "Are you sure the ballot box was changed just because the seal on the storage room was changed?" Instead of empathizing with the fact that the investigation was not conducted properly, he asked an illogical question: "Are you sure it was changed?"

Lawyer Park reiterated, "Yes," when Lee Jun-seok asked again, "Is it true that a judge sealed it?" She emphasized, "The chief judge sealed it, and because it was changed, we strongly appealed. As I mentioned earlier, the ballot box was also swapped in Paju-eul, and it was clearly swapped in Yeongdeungpo-eul."

Lee Jun-seok again asked a sudden question, "The counting was completed after May 2020. Why would they swap it then?" and lawyer Park replied, "According to Article 225, it is stipulated that trials must be completed within 6 months, but they have been extending it indefinitely," pointing out that the Supreme Court itself violated the provision that election trials should be completed within 6 months, considering the urgency of the matter, which could change the election outcome.

She added, "During the Yangsan recount, lawyer Hyun Sung-sam also examined it with a paper expert and found the ballots very strange. When we actually measured the paper, it was 150g/m2. The principle for ballot paper is 100g/m2, so we asked Judge Cho Jae-yeon of the Supreme Court at the time to measure it, but he refused."

<한미일보> understood the situation at the time to be as follows.

On August 30, 2021, the Supreme Court held a recount in Yeongdeungpo-eul at the Seoul Southern District Court, but controversy erupted when suspicions were raised that the seal on the handle of the ballot box storage room had been changed.

At the time, it was revealed that the police had covered up the case of suspected ballot box tampering in the Paju-eul constituency during the April 15, 2020, 21st General Election, and suspicions of ballot box smuggling in Yeongdeungpo-eul were also raised, but the investigation was subsequently dropped.

According to the police's suspension of investigation decision, obtained exclusively by <한미일보> at the time, the Yeongdeungpo Police Station, which was handling the case of suspected tampering with the seal on the entrance door of the ballot box storage room in Yeongdeungpo-eul during the April 15 general election, suspended the investigation on February 7 of the previous year, six months after the investigation was requested.

According to the decision, the police stated, "The identity of the person who defaced the entrance door seal could not be determined, and there was insufficient evidence for pursuit. Therefore, the investigation is suspended until the whereabouts of the unidentified person are discovered."

This reason for suspending the investigation could be interpreted as the police stating that they would not investigate until the culprit was caught. It has been pointed out that the police may have underestimated the seriousness of the matter.

Notably, fingerprint analysis and CCTV verification were not conducted.

Police did not summon the NEC even once and 'closed the investigation.'

Despite the grave nature of the matter, the police suspended the investigation. The suspension of investigation decision was prepared under the name of Senior Officer Lee Ji-won. Upon confirmation with the Yeongdeungpo Police Station, this officer is currently the head of the Intelligent Crime Investigation Team 3. When asked about the deadline for completing investigations, a source from the Intelligent Crime Team stated in a phone call, "It varies depending on the case, so it is difficult to provide a uniform answer."

It is unclear whether the police requested fingerprint analysis from the National Forensic Service. In this regard, a legal representative for the plaintiff stated in a phone call with this reporter, "They only summoned plaintiff Park Yong-chan once for an investigation. I have not heard of any efforts being made to secure evidence."

The legal team further stated, "Even if the suspect could not be apprehended, at least the police's confirmation that the seal was altered would have helped to prove that the integrity of the election was compromised, thereby contributing to invalidating the election. Sending a decision to suspend the investigation after only about six months, without even apprehending the culprit, is an abdication of the investigative agency's duties."

The legal team had previously expressed their intention to present additional evidence based on the investigation results. Kwon Oh-yong, a lawyer for the plaintiff, stated in a phone call with this reporter, "During the Supreme Court recount, many ballots appeared to be not properly cast and counted, and although we requested examination for numerous ballots, most of the requests were denied. We request that the court carefully consider the claims we have made after reviewing various materials." However, the police's delay in judging the issue of seal tampering effectively blocked the legal team's path to presenting further evidence to the judiciary.

The main responsibility of the Supreme Court during the recount was to verify whether the ballot boxes were actually swapped. The police also had a corresponding investigative responsibility. However, similar to Paju-eul, it was revealed that the police had effectively covered up the case in Yeongdeungpo-eul.

At the time, the police cited "inability to identify the perpetrator and insufficient clues for pursuit" as the reason for suspending the investigation.

Police investigation rule 98 stipulates five grounds for suspending an investigation: (1) whereabouts of the suspect unknown; (2) suspect or witness unable to be investigated due to reasons such as staying abroad for more than two months, serious illness, etc.; (3) time required for expert examination in cases of medical malpractice, traffic accidents, patent infringement, etc.; (4) time required for decisions or rulings by other agencies or courts; and (5) critical evidence located abroad.

By stating "we don't know who the culprit is," the police seem to have neglected their duty to investigate allegations of abuse of power, obstruction of official duties, and betrayal of official secrets, which were filed by the plaintiff.

A senior police official, in a phone call with this reporter, stated, "It is the inherent duty of the police to narrow down the investigation through fingerprint forensics and find the perpetrator. Although I need to look into the specifics, it is plausible to suspect that the investigation was either not pursued due to a lack of willingness or was suspended due to external pressure."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 18] Lawyer Park Ju-hyun: "Even with a judge present with a court order, the NEC refused to submit the proportional representation ballot boxes."

27th, 11:06 PM

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun stated, "Even though a judge presented a court order to submit the ballot boxes, the NEC refused." [Capture from Fan & Mic video]

It has newly come to light that when former Future United Party (predecessor to the People Power Party) lawmaker Min Kyung-wook applied for evidence preservation for the ballot boxes in the Incheon Yeonseo-eul constituency, the Election Commission refused to provide the proportional representation ballot boxes, even though a judge issued an order to "preserve the evidence."

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun stated at the "End of Fraudulent Elections Debate" on the 27th, "Mr. Min applied for preservation, and on April 29th, he went to the Incheon Yeonseo-gu Election Commission with Judge Ahn Min-yong, but the NEC Secretary-General said, 'We absolutely cannot provide the proportional representation ballot boxes.' Initially, they said they would provide them, but they couldn't take them. The Secretary-General objected, and likely after calling the head of the Incheon Election Commission, Judge Ahn gave up on taking the proportional representation ballot boxes. There was a judge and a court order, but they couldn't take the proportional representation ballot boxes."

Lawyer Park said, "Later, how did the court order change? At that time, it was changed to constituency ballot boxes. It changed when the NEC appealed. I was surprised then. The NEC doesn't even listen to court orders and judges. Why did they only change the constituency ballot boxes and not the proportional representation ballot boxes? They did not provide the proportional representation ballot boxes despite the judge and the court order."

She stated that there were 126 lawsuits, and they all lost. Proportional representation ballot boxes were also included. She asked, "Do you know how many proportional representation ballot boxes were preserved for evidence? It was 10. But do you know what happened? Not a single one could be opened."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 17] "Legislating printed seals through the 'mouth-covering law'... If seals are stamped, all fraudulent elections disappear."

27th, 10:50 PM

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun. [Capture from Fan & Mic video]

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun pointed out, "The National Intelligence Service's security inspection practically stated the possibility of mass forgery of ballots, saying that voting seals and stamps can be easily forged and seals can be stolen. However, they continue to insist on printing and affixing the voting administrator's seal."

Lawyer Park said, "When Minister of the Interior and Safety Lee Sang-min asked why they continued to use printed seals, the NEC replied, 'It takes more time.' So, they brought in 100 employees from the Ministry of the Interior and Safety and had them do it the same way from 6 PM, and the time taken was the same. Therefore, there is no reason to continue forcing printed seals."

She continued, "More importantly, yesterday, they are trying to legislate printed seals, similar to the 'mouth-covering law' of the National Referendum Act. In the past, the Public Official Election Act stipulated that seals should be stamped, not printed. However, they created a rule that violates the law, and the Supreme Court kept approving it as acceptable, so they have been covering it up. Now, they are changing the law themselves by not using seals. What do you think of this?" she directly asked Lee Jun-seok.

When CEO Kim Mi-young emphasized, "If you just stamp the seal, all fraudulent elections will disappear," and Lee Jun-seok evaded a direct answer by asking, "Let's assume the ballot boxes are changed to bag-style. What is the reason for that?" lawyer Park raised the issue again.

Lawyer Park said, "Then there is no reason for that. Why are you considering efficiency? You should be considering transparency and integrity. Ballot boxes used to be made of steel. There would be no reason to create such irregular special seals, would there?"

When Lee Jun-seok repeatedly raised the issue of "bag-style problems," lawyer Park said, "They cannot be sealed. If you lift them, they come off. Your finger can go in."

Lawyer Park repeatedly pointed out, "If you prove that your finger can go in, will you change it?" and Lee Jun-seok continued the debate, making unilateral claims such as "What I couldn't prove is..."

Lee Jun-seok argued, "They are not saying that the seal was damaged, leading to fraudulent elections, but are they just suggesting the possibility of fraud if it's bag-style and can be lifted?" and lawyer Park replied, "It's not a possibility. Didn't we see the seals changed on May 29th, 30th, and June 1st? It's important why the seals were changed with fake signatures."

Lee Jun-seok insisted again, "For example, they are not saying that people came and changed the seal signatures," and lawyer Park pointed out that Lee Jun-seok was mistaken by saying, "They did. The observers raised the issue."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 16] Lawyer Park Ju-hyun: "There is even a recording of court guards taking away NEC ballots."

27th, 10:30 PM

A screenshot from a mobile phone video taken at 4:11 PM on November 12, 2021, showing three court guards who had a conversation about "the NEC taking away ballots by car" smoking and then entering the courthouse (circled in yellow). At the time, there were other court employees smoking near the three guards, making it difficult to film up close. As the three walked, cars continuously entered and exited the parking lot near the smoking area, making filming difficult, and it was only captured on video just before they entered the building. The three were wearing winter court guard jackets. One was estimated to be over 185cm tall, and the other two were around 175cm. At least one was using an iPhone. One of the court guards was wearing white sneakers, suggesting it might have been before or after a shift change. Court guards wear dress shoes while on duty. / Photo: Reporter Heo Gyeom

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun pointed out, "There is a news report about court guards in the Paju-eul constituency speaking about the NEC taking away ballots. Therefore, as I mentioned earlier, what should be in the (recounted ballot boxes) is not there, and what should not be there is present."

<한미일보> understood the situation at the time to be as follows.

During the recount for the April 15 general election in Paju-eul, Gyeonggi Province, court guards were captured having a conversation about "the NEC taking away ballots by car."

As a result, it was anticipated that an investigation by law enforcement agencies would be unavoidable to determine whether the National Election Commission had actually participated in "ballot box swapping," but the case was closed without a proper investigation, causing public outrage.

According to an investigation by this newspaper in July 2023, on November 12, 2021, the Supreme Court's Third Division (Presiding Justice Lee Heung-gu, Associate Justice Ahn Cheol-sang, Justice Kim Jae-hyung) conducted a recount for the election invalidation lawsuit filed by former Future United Party candidate Park Yong-ho at the Goyang Branch of the Uijeongbu District Court in Ilsan, Gyeonggi Province. A recount is a procedure to verify whether the number of ballots cast matches the number of marked ballots, checking for tabulation errors or the influx of fraudulent ballots. The Supreme Court presided over the recount, with observers from the plaintiff's side and NEC officials from the defendant's side in attendance.

Around 4 PM that day, three men wearing court guard winter uniforms were captured having a suspicious conversation in the outdoor smoking area adjacent to the Judicial Research and Training Institute wall on the south side of the courthouse. The conversation was presumed to be about the NEC tampering with the ballot boxes before the recount.

According to the transcript at the time, Court Guard A stated, "The (NEC) is taking away ballots by car," drawing the attention of his colleagues. As Guards B and C, who were listening, looked at him, Guard A said, "This fraudulent NEC, ballots (inaudible part: presumed 'transporting')." He then continued, "Hey, stop it! (inaudible part: presumed 'they are doing it')."

The fact that Guard A used the expression "fraudulent NEC" in the transcript is noteworthy. As suspicions of fraud in the April 15 general election spread, those claiming that fraudulent elections occurred often used the derogatory term "fraudulent NEC" by combining "fraudulent election" and "NEC." It is unclear whether Guard A recognized the NEC's actions, which he seemed to have witnessed directly, as "fraudulent elections," or if he was unconsciously repeating a slogan from a protest outside the courthouse.

Furthermore, Guard A's expression, "This fraudulent NEC, there is O O," can be interpreted as a nuance of reporting a certain issue.

The conversation suggests that NEC officials, who arrived at the courthouse early on the day of the recount, may have made arbitrary changes to the ballot boxes. Kim Yong-kwon, head of the Legal Affairs Division and known as the highest-ranking NEC official present at the recount, was first spotted around 8:25 AM. Mr. Kim and a group appearing to be NEC officials emerged from the building and headed towards the smoking area. Apart from uniformed police officers deployed for a pre-announced legal protest, no representatives from the plaintiff's side had yet arrived. Around 8:35 AM, lawyer Do Tae-woo was the first to enter the main gate of the courthouse. An intelligence officer stated, "It seems the NEC arrived before 8 AM, but it's not certain."

Under current law, ballot boxes must not be unsealed or opened arbitrarily or moved without court permission until the recount. However, rumors of tampering with ballot boxes surfaced at every recount site of the April 15 general election. Doubts were also raised that the seals on the ballot box storage rooms showed signs of being removed and reapplied, distinguishable by pre- and post-recount photos. During the Moon Jae-in administration, no proper investigation was conducted by the prosecution, only amplifying the suspicions.

Amidst this, it was confirmed that three court guards, responsible for court security and protection, had a specific conversation stating, "The NEC is taking away ballots by car." It is speculated that Guard A's statement implies elements of a crime, such as: △Subject: NEC, △Object: Ballots, △Tool: Vehicle, △Action: Smuggling, △Method: Urging ("Get rid of the XX car!"), and △Intent (犯意): Attempt to conceal ("Hey, don't come!"). This is not a matter that can be casually joked about over cigarettes, and if true, it could be a grave matter of the NEC, which is responsible for maintaining election neutrality, participating in election result manipulation.

Attendees at the recount included plaintiff Park Yong-ho, former Prime Minister Hwang Kyo-ahn, former Assembly member Min Kyung-wook, lawyer Kwon Oh-yong, and lawyer Do Tae-woo, who participated as parties to the lawsuit and observers. Also present was the late Kim Jae-hong, CEO of Freedom's Window, who passed away last October. Mr. Kim, who had been raising suspicions of organized election result manipulation and fraudulent elections and participated in Supreme Court trials, told reporters, "The more they try to cover it up, the more it will be revealed." He passed away in a traffic accident last October.

Police 'closed the investigation' without ever summoning the NEC.

In a press conference held in front of the courthouse after the recount, former Prime Minister Hwang Kyo-ahn lamented, "An innumerable number of counterfeit ballots poured out, and there were many signs that the ballot boxes had been tampered with, leaving even the NEC in a state of bewilderment. Ballots that could not possibly have appeared without complete ballot box replacement or obvious swapping were found, so the April 15 election must be declared null and void." Hwang, a former prosecutor, is a high-ranking official among those who have stated that the April 15 general election was fraudulent. He is considered one of the most authoritative figures who has handled election cases among current and former prosecutors. During the Yoon administration, there was once public opinion from those who believe fraudulent elections occurred that a special prosecutor for fraudulent elections should be established.

Lawyer Kwon Oh-yong, a former prosecutor who has participated in fraudulent election trials, also stated after the recount, "There were individuals born in 1896 (the 33rd year of King Gojong's reign) on the voter roll, which should not have been the case. Furthermore, many ballot papers for same-day voting were found to be stiff and uniformly stacked like new bills without any folds, suggesting that the ballot boxes were opened and new ballots were poured in to match the manipulated vote counts." Lawyer Do Tae-woo, who also observed the recount, testified, "Most of the types of fraudulent ballots previously found appeared in large quantities, and even completely new types of fraudulent ballots beyond our imagination were discovered," he condemned.

According to the combined testimonies of the observers, the Paju-eul constituency, which includes the Civilian Control Line and is traditionally a stronghold for conservative candidates, witnessed the following during the recount: △11 "blank ballots" without the voting administrator's seal; △Paju-gap ballots found in the Paju-eul recount ballot box; △ballots stacked stiffly like new bills without ever being folded; △ ballots stuck together in pairs or threes; △two "cabbage leaf" ballots with overlapping regional and proportional representation marks; △21 ballots appearing consecutively with inconsistent side spacing; △suspicious ballots with lines along the side of the ballot bundle; △ ballots with distorted voting administrator's seals; △ballots with distorted voting marks; △suspicious proportional representation ballots with remnants of "Pro-Park Alliance No. 11," which cannot be printed with inkjet; and △a discrepancy between the number of voters and the voter roll in Jindo-myeon, with 70 votes missing. These were all observed simultaneously and some were filmed at the Paju-eul recount site.

The ballots without the voting administrator's seal, which are clearly invalid, have recently attracted unusual attention. In Geumchon 2-dong, Paju-si, the voting record indicated that 20 ballots without the administrator's seal were issued to voters, and one ballot with a serial number that could not be cut off was also present. There was no such record in Geumchon 3-dong.

According to current law, voting administrators who discover any irregularities in the ballots must record them. It is a mandatory, not optional, duty.

However, in Geumchon 3-dong, which had no such records, 11 ballots without the voting administrator's seal were found in the ballot box during the recount. Conversely, the 20 ballots issued without the administrator's seal, as recorded in Geumchon 2-dong, all had the administrator's seal affixed.

The fact that abnormal ballots appeared where they should not have, and abnormal ballots did not appear where they should have, raised reasonable suspicions that someone had tampered with the ballot boxes. Park Yong-ho, a businessman who served as the Chairman of the Presidential Committee for Youth under the Park Geun-hye administration, filed a complaint with the Uijeongbu District Prosecutors' Office, Goyang Branch, in August last year, accusing NEC officials in Paju-si of forgery of public documents and other charges.

However, the Paju Police, who were in charge of the case, closed the case as unfounded in November of last year and again in May of this year as non-prosecution. Non-prosecution means that the police concluded the case at their level and did not forward it to the prosecution. Strong opposition arose, arguing that this was not a matter to be casually dismissed by the police. This absurd incident of covering up the case was reported to the world by a report from Finance Today, which has been focusing on suspicions of fraudulent elections in the April 15 election.

The newspaper quoted lawyer Do Tae-woo, the plaintiff's legal representative, as saying that the police had not summoned the NEC even once for questioning in both instances where they concluded the case as unfounded.

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 15] Lee Young-don: "Lee Jun-seok misunderstands the law of large numbers... With 150,000 people, there should be no difference between same-day and advance voting."

27th, 10:00 PM

PD Lee Young-don directly stated, "Lee Jun-seok misunderstands the law of large numbers."

PD Lee pointed out, "If it comes from such a large cluster, such a population of 150,000 people, it cannot differ based on income level or knowledge as it does now."

When Lee Jun-seok raised an issue about "encouragement" regarding the correlation chart between advance voting rates and turnout rates in the 21st general election, he retorted, "Encouragement is diluted in an election district of 150,000 people, so it cannot appear that way. This is something taught in high school textbooks."

PD Lee said, "Many people know that exit polls are conducted on people who voted on the same day. However, after referencing those who voted on the same day, a telephone survey is conducted for those who voted in advance 4-5 days prior. This is then adjusted using the population correction information provided by the NEC. What does this 'correction' mean? If that's the case, the results become very similar to the exit poll announced by the broadcasting companies."

When Lee Jun-seok argued, "Of course, if you conduct a survey of 20,000 samples and create correction values, they will be accurate," PD Lee replied, "And the phone numbers for those conducting the exit polls are provided by the NEC."

In response, lawyer Park Ju-hyun asked Lee Jun-seok, "Do you trust opinion polls?" and after Lee replied, "Yes," lawyer Park stated, "The NEC announced the same-day voting rate as 55.6% and the advance voting rate as 44.4%. However, according to an NEC survey, only 36.3% voted in advance."

Lawyer Park continued, "If you believe this opinion poll, then the 44.4% advance voting rate announced by the NEC is inflated. In other words, 4.36 million votes were inflated. This is because there were people who voted six times, etc."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 14] Kim Mi-young: "Lee Geun-hyeong's advance voting adjustment value... The initial design is important."

27th, 9:30 PM

Kim Mi-young, CEO of VON, pointed out, "Lee Geun-hyeong, head of strategy and planning at the Democratic Research Institute, used the term 'advance voting adjustment value'," emphasizing the importance of the initial design.

CEO Kim stressed, "If we were to set strategies to win elections, there would be no need for adjustments in advance voting," implying that Representative Lee Jun-seok needs to focus more on this issue.

When Lee Jun-seok scoffed, "The reason for fraudulent elections is sometimes to receive subsidies, and sometimes it's just for fun to match the numbers," CEO Kim replied, "It's not for fun. It's because the votes need to be hidden, so it can be considered a form of optimization. There are various factors, such as matching the overall population. Therefore, the initial plan is formulated quite meticulously."

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun held up a panel with "Advance Voting Adjustment Value" written on it and asked, "At that time, Lee Geun-hyeong accurately predicted 180 seats. Have you heard the term 'advance voting adjustment value'?"

To this, Lee Jun-seok retorted, "No. Then, Lawyer, do you think broadcasting companies can predict advance voting adjustments without them and still be accurate after exit polls?" Lawyer Park directly replied, "I think it is manipulation."

In response, CEO Kim Mi-young asked, "No, how can (broadcasting companies) know the advance voting adjustment value?"

CEO Kim asked again a moment later, "The term 'advance voting adjustment' was used in February, for the general election that took place in April. How can (Lee Jun-seok say that broadcasting companies know this)?" However, Lee Jun-seok did not answer.

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 13] "Just as President Yoon was elected despite fraudulent elections, the fact of being elected and the existence of significant manipulation are separate."

27th, 9:20 PM

According to the comparative analysis of the sampling turnout of unclassified ballots and the same-day and final turnout rates, the Democratic Party's final turnout rate increased by an average of 7.7% compared to sampling in the April 10 general election, while the People Power Party's decreased by an average of 7.7%. Capture from Professor Emeritus Kwon Won-tae's presentation video.

Regarding the case of Yangsan, Gyeonggi Province, lawyer Park Ju-hyun pointed out to Representative Lee Jun-seok, who questioned the election of the People Power Party candidate, "The issue is not who was elected, but the fact that such significant manipulation occurred."

Lawyer Park stated, "Just as President Yoon was elected despite fraudulent elections, it is possible to be elected even with fraudulent elections, whether the fraudulent elections were prevented or the manipulating forces failed for some reason. Similar to how President Trump said 'too big to rig' (meaning victory despite a significant vote difference) in his recent speech, he said that in the 2024 election as well, there were irregularities, but I won."

When Lee Jun-seok countered, "He won with 59.8% to 35.7%. Was this also a fraudulent election?" lawyer Park and CEO Kim Mi-young replied, "It could be, it's entirely possible."

Lawyer Park continued, "The reason is, as I was working on this, I learned a surprising fact: the difference between 15% and 10% in the 2020 April 15 general election was that all Democratic Party candidates, except for Gyeongju, exceeded 15% and received 100% reimbursement."

In response, Lee Jun-seok changed the subject, asking, "What is the fraudulent election in Yangsan?"

<한미일보> research indicates that suspicions of electronic manipulation to secure election cost reimbursement have been strongly raised.

It has been alleged that electronic manipulation was carried out to add votes to independent and Justice Party candidates in the Honam region, where the Democratic Party was expected to win overwhelmingly, in order to receive election cost reimbursements.

Professor Emeritus Kwon Won-tae of the University of Seoul announced in November 2024 that based on a comparative analysis of the turnout rates of ballots hand-counted because they could not pass through electronic ballot counting machines and the same-day and final turnout rates, this pattern was observed in the 22nd General Election (April 10 General Election) held in April.

According to Professor Kwon, Democratic Party candidates' final turnout rates increased by an average of 7.7% compared to the manually counted sampling, while People Power Party candidates' final turnout rates decreased by an average of 7.7%.

For example, in the Gwangjin-eul constituency in Seoul, a Democratic Party candidate received 37.2% in manual counting, 44.4% on the same day, and a final turnout rate of 51.48% after adding advance voting rates, thus winning the election, according to the analysis.

Conversely, a People Power Party candidate in the same constituency received 61.6% in manual counting, 54.6% on the same day, and a final turnout rate of 47.6%, showing a continuous decrease and ultimately losing the election, according to the analysis.

This pattern was evident nationwide, except for some areas in Honam.

In eight constituencies where independent or Justice Party candidates ran and People Power Party candidates received less than 10%, the Democratic Party candidates' final turnout rates actually decreased.

Professor Kwon derived a surprising analysis result: in all eight constituencies, the decrease in the Democratic Party candidates' turnout rates was exactly matched by an increase in the turnout rates of independent or Justice Party candidates.

Specifically, in Buk-gu, Gwangju, a Democratic Party candidate received 72.0% in manual counting sampling but only 69.2% on the same day, a decrease of 2.8 percentage points. In the same constituency, a Justice Party candidate received 14.8% in manual counting but increased by 3.1 percentage points to 17.9% on the same day.

Furthermore, in Damyang-Hampyeong-Yeonggwang, a Democratic Party candidate received 59.4% in manual counting sampling but only 52.3% on the same day, a significant decrease of 7.1 percentage points. In the same area, an independent candidate received 39.0% on the same day, an increase of 6.6 percentage points from their manual count of 32.4%.

The difference in turnout rates for People Power Party candidates in these two constituencies was minimal, ranging from -0.72% to +0.80%. While the difference in the People Power Party's turnout rates was negligible, the Democratic Party's turnout decreased, and the independent or Justice Party candidates' turnout increased accordingly.

Seven out of the eight independent candidates running in these constituencies were former Democratic Party members.

Conversely, in other constituencies in Honam where independent and Justice Party candidates did not run, there was almost no difference.

In Dong-gu-gap, Gwangju, the difference between manual counting and same-day voting rates was minimal for both the Democratic Party (-0.3 percentage points) and the People Power Party (+0.3 percentage points). In Wanju-Jinan-Muju, the difference was also negligible: Democratic Party (-0.4 percentage points) and People Power Party (+0.4 percentage points).

As a result, seven out of the eight independent and Justice Party candidates who ran in these constituencies received full reimbursement of their election expenses, and one received half. This is because their final turnout rates exceeded 15% or 10%, respectively.

Professor Kwon stated through a YouTube video channel of former Prime Minister Hwang Kyo-ahn that the probability of an increase in the turnout rates of independent and Justice Party candidates matching the decrease in the Democratic Party's turnout rates is 0%. He argued that this result is inexplicable without intentional manipulation to secure election cost reimbursement.

Meanwhile, Professor Kwon explained that he based his research and analysis on the premise that unclassified ballots that do not pass through electronic ballot counting machines amount to an average of over 1,000 per constituency and are manually re-sorted, making them useful samples for predicting final results, similar to opinion polls.

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 12] Lawyer Park Ju-hyun: "Out of over 100 complaints regarding the NEC, only one warrant was issued in Pohang."

27th, 8:55 PM

A fake pre-voting ballot with a QR code was discovered in the review and counting department of the counting center for the 22nd General Election held at Pohang Buk-gu on the 10th. Provided by informant.

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun criticized the judiciary's lukewarm stance, stating, "Out of over 100 complaints regarding the NEC, only one warrant was issued."

Lawyer Park stated, "The QR code was changed to a barcode from 2024. They deleted the serial number, cowardly. However, a QR code with a serial number appeared in Pohang. This is a counterfeit ballot. When I filed a complaint, a warrant was issued, and after fingerprint comparison, what happened?" she drew attention to the matter.

She continued, "Only the fingerprints of NEC officials appeared, and the investigation was suspended. Aside from that, no warrants were ever issued," pointing out the issue.

<한미일보> research indicates that it was later revealed that pre-voting ballots from the 21st general election four years ago, which had QR codes, appeared at the counting center for the 22nd General Election held on April 10 last year, causing controversy.

Until the 21st general election held in April 2020, QR codes were used, but due to repeated criticisms that they compromised election integrity, they were all replaced with barcodes starting from this 22nd general election.

According to the informant at the time, an abnormal ballot with a QR code was spotted around 9:10 PM on the 10th, during the counting for Pohang Buk-gu at the Yangdeok Hanmaeum Gymnasium counting center in Pohang-si Buk-gu.

The problematic QR code pre-voting ballot was found in the review and counting department. This is where ballots that have passed through the ballot sorting machine arrive. Sequentially, it is presumed that the QR code ballot passed through the sorting machine.

The informant said, "I heard a male, who appeared to be a counting office worker, say, 'Huh? What is this paper? What is this paper?' in the review and counting department. An observer approached and took a picture." He added, "Immediately, a male, who seemed to be a manager from the Buk-gu Election Commission, came and said, 'This is a ballot from the previous election, there's something wrong. We will seal it and treat it as invalid,' and then he took the counterfeit ballot and went to where the election officials were."

The fake pre-voting ballot with the QR code also had the seal of the 'Uchang-dong Voting Administrator' on the bottom left.

Meanwhile, on the first day of advance voting, the 5th, before voting began, observers provided evidence videos showing that from 5 AM to 6 AM, they meticulously inspected the inside of the ballot boxes and the bag containers with the NEC, confirming that no foreign matter was mixed in.

The informant stated, "Since we thoroughly inspected the ballot boxes and bags inside and out before voting began, it is impossible for a pre-voting ballot from four years ago to have been inserted. The NEC must clearly explain the circumstances under which the pre-voting ballot was inserted."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 11] Kim Mi-young: "If Lee Jun-seok opens his heart and looks, he will see."

27th, 8:47 PM

End of Fraudulent Elections Marathon Debate. [Capture from Fan & Mic video]

One can understand the extent of fraudulent elections, not just the scale, but also the detailed methods, and then there is no confusion at all.

CEO Kim Mi-young suggested, "If Representative Lee Jun-seok opens his heart a little and looks into it, I think he will see (the fraudulent elections)."

CEO Kim emphasized, "If you understand the extent of fraudulent elections, not just the scale, but also the detailed methods, then there is no confusion at all."

She continued, "Fraudulent elections are carried out by a minority, and counterfeit ballots are made in one place." She implied that not all involved parties can grasp this content. "The most important aspect of fraudulent elections, based on 2020, is the manipulation of voter turnout. In fact, problems arise because the voter turnout is set first, and then the ballots are adjusted."

She also pointed out, "As you all know, when manipulating votes, it is not based on where the vote was cast, but on the residential address. When the voting turnout is announced, it is impossible to know who voted where and how. In reality, the manipulation of voter turnout is the core issue, and problems arise because the votes are adjusted to match the manipulated voter turnout."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 10] Lawyer Park Ju-hyun: "A prosecutor admitted, 'Pressure is coming in.'"

27th, 8:28 PM

End of Fraudulent Elections Marathon Debate video [Capture from Fan & Mic video]

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun also revealed a confession from a current prosecutor to demonstrate that investigations into suspicions of fraudulent elections have never been conducted properly.

Lawyer Park said, "I asked a prosecutor at the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office to check the voter rolls, and the prosecutor, born in '86, said, 'The Election Commission won't provide them.' When I demanded a search warrant, he confessed, 'Pressure is coming in.'"

She added, "Investigations are not even possible in this way. It's something that can be examined, like searching the NEC servers. However, when an investigation is conducted, I don't know what kind of large cartel exists, but there are such serious problems."

In response, Representative Lee Jun-seok muttered, "The prosecution is a cartel, and the police are a cartel..." and CEO Kim Mi-young added, "That's right."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 9] Lawyer Park Ju-hyun: "Even a simple comparison of image files from the recount and the actual general election was not done."

Representative Lee Jun-seok listening attentively to lawyer Park Ju-hyun's explanation. [Capture from Fan & Mic video]

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun cited a case where the police issued a non-prosecution decision without even a simple comparison of image files, despite complaints about ballot forgery, such as "cabbage leaf" ballots.

Lawyer Park lamented, "They don't even review the difference between the image files from the recount and the image files from the April 15 general election."

Specifically, she said, "It's a non-prosecution (no charges) reason statement. I went to the Pyeongtaek Police Station and asked them to secure the NEC image files, but they said, 'The NEC won't provide them.' So, when I demanded a search warrant, the reason stated in the non-prosecution statement was: 'The claim is that the NEC may have manipulated them. Unless there is other important evidence that could overturn the parliamentary election invalidation lawsuit, image file confirmation is impossible at this stage (warrant denied).'"

Police's non-prosecution reason statement failing to compare image files. [Capture from Fan & Mic video]

She continued, "This simple comparison of the image files from the recount and the image files from the April 15 general election would suffice to examine the issue. This has nothing to do with personal information, yet they don't even do that," pointing out that the investigative agencies' inadequate response was excessive in dismissing the fraudulent election as a mere conspiracy theory.

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 8] Lee Jun-seok: "I didn't know about the difference between the NEC's announced voter numbers and the actual voter numbers."

27th, 8:08 PM

A YouTuber released a video empirically demonstrating the difference between the actual number of participants at the polling station and the number of participants announced by the NEC.

Lee Jun-seok, leader of the New Reform Party, was found to be unaware of the discrepancy between the voter numbers announced by the NEC and the actual number of voters.

Immediately after PD Lee Young-don's explanation, Lee pointed to him and said, "What's unfortunate is that you are counting people at the polling station to verify it. If only it had been recorded as video and counted, it would have been fine." He questioned the accuracy of election monitoring civic groups like Bupdae.

In response, lawyer Park Ju-hyun directly contradicted him, saying the reality was different.

Lawyer Park emphasized, "Video recordings exist," and added, "One person was even imprisoned for filming inside. The difference was over 1000 people."

Lee Jun-seok then asked if she meant, "Over 1000 more people voted..." and lawyer Park replied, "Yes, the difference between the number of advance voters and the number secretly filmed from outside was over 1000 people. This happened in Yangsan, Gyeongnam."

She continued, "They positioned themselves in areas where in-area and out-of-area were distinguished, and filmed the number of in-area and out-of-area voters. Isn't this something that should be investigated?" she pressed.

Previously, Mr. Han (YouTube name 'Hameon Dwgetji'), a YouTuber arrested in April last year on charges of installing surveillance cameras at pre-voting stations for the April 10 general election, had revealed in a video that there was a discrepancy of 1147 people between the actual voters and the number announced by election authorities at one polling station in a single day.

In fact, Mr. Han released a video questioning the NEC's practice of entering the total number of voters before the ballot counting machine starts operating.

According to the video, an NEC official replied, "It is correct that the number of ballots issued is entered, and then it is put into the counting machine." When Mr. Han asked again, "Is it that the number of ballots issued is entered, and then the counting machine is run?" the NEC confirmed, "Yes." Mr. Han then questioned, "Why is the total number entered beforehand?" but the NEC did not provide a clear answer in the video. Mr. Han pointed out, "It is not possible to avoid suspecting that the sorting machine is adjusting the last digits to match."

Furthermore, Mr. Han questioned whether a bank teller counts money by entering "100 sheets" and then counting. According to him, the NEC's method is no different from a bank teller writing down "98 sheets" beforehand and then counting the money.

Some have raised suspicions that the NEC's method is a preemptive measure intended to incorporate "manipulation values." The claim is that the total number of voters in the population, which corresponds to the target group, is arbitrarily changed to match the final result, with the pre-determined outcome in mind. In reality, scientists view this scenario as not physically impossible.

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 7] Kim Mi-young: "Do you believe there is no value in investigating?" as she pierced him, Lee Jun-seok: "Beyond suspicion..."

Kim Mi-young, CEO of VON (right) [Capture from Fan & Mic video]

Kim Mi-young, CEO of VON, posed a sudden question: "Based on what has been presented so far, are there no suspicions whatsoever, and is there no value in investigating them? Is there continued absolute trust in the NEC?"

Lee Jun-seok replied, "It's not a subject for investigation beyond being a matter of suspicion."

When Lee Jun-seok attempted to downplay the issue, stating, "It's not a subject for investigation beyond being a matter of suspicion," and asking, "Who is saying that?" CEO Kim countered, "If counterfeit money is found, an investigation is initiated based on the counterfeit money, not by searching for the person who made it," pointing out the issue.

To this, Lee Jun-seok muttered, "Counterfeit money is a crime in itself..." and Kim Mi-young retorted, "A ballot is worth the price of a car."

At this point, moderator Park Sang-gyu interjected, "It's good to follow the time and speak freely, but please be respectful when addressing the other party," leaving a sense of regret.

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 6] PD Lee Young-don: "The number of pre-voting participants announced by the NEC and the actual number in the pre-voting ballot boxes are different."

PD Lee Young-don (right) is speaking. [Capture from Fan & Mic video]

PD Lee Young-don stated, "The number of pre-voting participants announced by the NEC and the actual number of ballots in the pre-voting ballot boxes are different."

PD Lee explained, "If the NEC announces 40,000 participants, the actual number in the ballot boxes is 30,000, a difference of about 10,000, and these 10,000 votes are basically converted into Democratic Party votes." He added, "If these numbers are different, there are actually 10,000 votes missing, and I believe these 10,000 votes have become what I've identified as 'cabbage leaf' ballots."

He further stated, "After the 21st general election in 2020, there was an election invalidation lawsuit. There was a period of 1 year and 2 months between the start of the lawsuit and the actual opening of the ballot boxes. What happened during that time? When the ballot boxes were actually opened, the numbers in the NEC's announcement and the numbers in the ballot boxes were similar, with almost no difference."

He explained, "I believe that during that time, 10,000 votes, which were actually inserted, were manufactured in China and added. Therefore, at the counting site, large quantities of strange ballots, such as cabbage leaf ballots, appeared because they could not possibly be discovered."

He then directly addressed Lee Jun-seok's request for evidence by saying, "If you are asking for evidence, you should be investigating, not debating. The fraudulent elections we have identified are carried out in a truly meticulous manner, making it difficult to secure evidence that we can examine."

He concluded, "Therefore, the 22nd general election held in 2024 has not yet had its ballot boxes opened. That's why I keep arguing that if you open the advance voting ballot boxes in about ten selected constituencies, there will be far fewer ballots than announced by the NEC. Then, when the election invalidation lawsuit starts again, they will try to insert them again, but this time, the strange ballots manufactured in China and inserted in 2020 will be properly inserted. This is the fundamental conspiracy behind the election fraud as I understand it."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 5] Lawyer Park Ju-hyun: "Out of 1974 'sun flag' ballots, over 1000 were found, yet the ruling was 'not unusual.'"

Lawyer Park stated, "When asked in an election invalidation lawsuit, if the voting administrator was called and asked if they stamped it like that or saw it, they said 'I didn't see it,' and even asked others who found it strange, but they also said 'I didn't see it.' This is also stated in the ruling."

She continued, "However, the ruling stated that it was not unusual for the voting administrator not to be aware of such ballots or not to record them in the voting record, unless the voters or observers specifically raised an objection." She criticized the unreasonable nature of the ruling.

She explained, "This means that out of 1974 ballots, over 1000 appeared. This means over 10 ballots were stamped like this in 12 hours. When a public official stamps, it might get smudged. They might realize 'What am I doing?' and then stamp again."

Lee Jun-seok asked, "Is it that they inserted 'cabbage leaf' and 'sun flag' ballots in a hurry to conceal evidence later? Then, did the criminal organization produce defective ballots without any of them realizing it, and swap them? I don't know if the ones who swapped them were from the DJ faction, but it's strange that they produced defective ones while committing the crime."

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun countered, "The election was held on April 15th, and evidence preservation was initiated on April 29th. They wouldn't have known that an election invalidation lawsuit would be filed, so they made them in a hurry. The decision came out quickly after the evidence preservation application, within 2-3 days."

At this point, PD Lee Young-don took over, saying, "Let's cool down for a moment."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 4] Lawyer Park Ju-hyun: "'Cabbage leaf' ballots were not in the voting and counting records but appeared at the recount site."

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun pointed out the anomaly: "'Cabbage leaf' ballots were not in the voting and counting records but appeared at the recount site."

Lawyer Park stated, "When such ballots were received, it was considered strange, but it was not recorded in the voting records or counting records. They only appeared at the recount site. Such strange ballots should not appear, yet the Supreme Court ruled, 'There is no reason for the pre-voting ballots to be extracted and leave the problematic marks.' This is like ruling that a criminal who stabbed someone to death has no reason to leave the knife and fingerprints," she criticized.

She continued, "What is even more surprising is that 'cabbage leaf' ballots and arrow ballots, which were not in the voting and counting records, appeared at the recount site. Twenty ballots without the voting administrator's stamp were in the voting records, but they did not appear at the recount site." She questioned the reliability of the ballot preservation procedures.

She added, "Even though these were real problems, the Supreme Court justices could not make a ruling on them, so they were completely omitted from the Supreme Court's ruling."

In this regard, CEO Kim Mi-young explained, "They created entirely new ballots for the recount."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 3] Kim Mi-young: "Suspects are Yoon Ho-jung, Cho Hae-ju, Lee Hae-chan, Go Han-seok, and Yang Jung-chul, a group of 5 masterminds."

Representative Lee Jun-seok (left) and CEO Kim Mi-young. [Capture from Fan & Mic video]

When Lee Jun-seok asked who the culprits were, Kim Mi-young, CEO of VON, claimed, "The five key culprits I am focusing on are Yoon Ho-jung, Cho Hae-ju, Lee Hae-chan, Go Han-seok, and Yang Jung-chul." She added, "There is no power to investigate these individuals. President Yoon tried to investigate and is now in prison."

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun previously stated, "Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun initiated the manipulation of electronic ballot counting machines. When advance voting was introduced, they conducted public opinion manipulation operations to legitimize advance voting manipulation. Lee Jae-myung's approval rating is currently over 70%, but can you all relate to that?" she pointed out.

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 2] Lawyer Park Ju-hyun: "Fraudulent voting occurs in all stages of the election."

PD Lee Young-don stated, "Instead of using the mild term 'fraudulent election,' I would prefer to use the English term 'election fraud' or 'election swindle'," and added, "I believe fraud has been involved in electronic voting."

When Lee Jun-seok asked, "At which stage is there fraudulent voting?" PD Lee replied, "I believe there is a difference between the number of advance voting participants announced by the NEC and the number of advance voting participants actually counted. I believe this is done through electronic manipulation."

Lawyer Park Ju-hyun also stated, "Fraudulent voting occurs in all stages of the election process. From the stage of electoral district delimitation, public opinion manipulation, advance voting, counting, and even recounting and evidence preservation procedures, cartels are at play."

[Major Fraudulent Election Debate - Report 1] Lawyer Park Ju-hyun and CEO Kim Mi-young confirmed to participate.

Capture from Fan & Mic's broadcast video of the fraudulent election debate.

The lineup of participants for the fraudulent election debate was revealed for the first time.

At the "End of Fraudulent Elections Debate," which began at 6:10 PM on the 27th via the YouTube channel "Fan & Mic," CEO Jeon Han-gil, PD Lee Young-don, lawyer Park Ju-hyun, and CEO Kim Mi-young appeared.

Park Sang-gyu served as the moderator agreed upon by both sides.

Representative Lee Jun-seok appeared from the New Reform Party.