기사 메일전송
CEO Kim Mi-young Reveals '10 Key Terms Related to Election Fraud'
  • Lim Yo-hee
  • March 25, 2026 at 6:40 PM
기사수정
  • Kim Mi-young: "I will no longer tolerate attacks without context"
  • No response from the parties involved despite the revelation of the mastermind behind the fraudulent election.

"Bundles of ballots," cited as key evidence of election fraud, and VON Representative Kim Mi-young. [Photo = Lawyer Park Joo-hyun's Facebook, VON Broadcast Capture]

“I will not overlook those who, unable to grasp the keywords I presented at the Lee Jun-seok and Jeon Han-gil election fraud grand debate, spout nonsensical remarks and cause trouble here.”

 

On the 25th, Representative Kim stated via Facebook, “I have lost patience not only with those who accuse me of conspiracy theories during my campaign to investigate election fraud, but also with those who are part of the investigation movement. There are those who are still floundering at the starting point, even at a time when hundreds, including the President, are unjustly imprisoned.”

 

At the election fraud grand debate held on February 27th, the day before the US and Israel bombed Iran, VON Representative Kim Mi-young resolutely declared, “Sue me if I am wrong,” and named Lee Hae-chan, Go Han-seok, Yang Jeong-cheol, Jo Hae-ju, and the current Minister of Interior and Safety, Yoon Ho-jung, as the primary culprits of election fraud, following Kim Dae-jung and Nam Min-woo.

 

Following this, Representative Kim Mi-young reportedly faced attacks not only from her opponents but also from the right-wing (Entuchupados).

 

Representative Kim explained her absence from the second part of the debate by stating she had “already presented all the keywords to unravel the South Korean election fraud” and posted supplementary explanations related to the 10 keywords.

 

1. The Manhattan Project (a top-secret project involving politicians, military personnel, and scientists)

 

2. Statistics represent a phenomenon, not evidence.

 

3. Anomalous statistics are merely the result of sophisticated design.

 

4. The true evidence is the physical voter registry printed on election day.

 

5. Items like "cabbage leaf ballots" are not definitive proof of guilt in criminal trials, though they may be considered "reasonable grounds" to initiate an investigation, regardless of civil implications.

 

6. Crimes like misprints on banknotes can be grounds for initiating an investigation on their face value, even without a perpetrator. Yet, no one from the National Election Commission has ever been held criminally liable for ballot misprints. Negligence by public officials constitutes a crime.

 

7. While proxies for election invalidation lawsuits handle evidence at a civil level, President Yoon Suk-yeol understood the need for evidence beyond a reasonable doubt from a prosecutor's perspective. (However, he lacked the authority to investigate. The impeachment of prosecutors, judges, and the Board of Audit and Inspection chair was precisely to prevent an investigation into election fraud!)

8. The main perpetrators (based on the 2020 general election) are considered to be Yoon Ho-jung, Lee Hae-chan, Jo Hae-ju, Go Han-seok, and Yang Jeong-cheol.

 

9. The current core of election fraud lies not in manipulating electronic vote-counting machines, but in increasing voter turnout and concentrating those votes (through mail-in ballots, ballot stuffing, etc.). Allowing printed ballots instead of individual seals for early voting officials was intended to pre-print fraudulent ballots in bulk at a single location.

 

10. The key to manipulating electronic equipment is to increase voter turnout while tampering with the integrated voter registry in digital file format. There is no way to verify this, and every stage of the election process is a blind spot.

 

Furthermore, Representative Kim Mi-young stated, “I attempted to explain the above, but neither side, nor even the moderator, would grant me the microphone. I will not let those who post nonsense here (on my personal Facebook) go unpunished; they will be treated as accomplices after the fact.”

 

In response, netizens offered their support to Representative Kim Mi-young with comments such as, “We understand your sincerity, Representative. It seems this was excluded because it was a topic that couldn't be discussed in depth during a multi-person debate. The important points seem to have been conveyed.”

 

Representative Jeon Han-gil had also expressed gratitude to Representative Kim Mi-young for revealing the names of five individuals, prepared to face legal consequences.

 

Meanwhile, many are concerned about Representative Kim Mi-young's safety. However, it is reported that no lawsuits have been filed against her, nor has any third party lodged a complaint, even three weeks later.


관련기사
What do you think of this article?
recommend
0
great
0
moved
0

This article has 2comments.

  • Profile
    guest2026-03-26 01:34:29

    멍청도 견찰을 겪어보니 ㅋ 경찰은 ai대체 시급

  • Profile
    guest2026-03-25 21:49:04

    부정선거의 정황이 많이 나왔는데도 아무런 수사가 이루어지지 않고 있다. 그것이 바로 카르텔이 존재한다는 반증이다. 김미영 대표의 말이 길지만 차분히 경청하면 많은 의문이 풀린다. 왜 이 나라가 이렇게 되었나?

정기구독배너
Go to Mobile Site