기사 메일전송
[Analysis] The industry is strong, so why did the won collapse?
  • Kim Young
  • March 28, 2026 at 6:00 AM
기사수정
  • The industry endured and the stock market rose.
  • However, the weakening won did not stop.
  • The market reflected distrust before policy signals.

On the afternoon of the 26th, dealers are working at the Hana Bank dealing room in Jung-gu, Seoul, where the KOSPI closed at 5,460.46, down 181.75 points (3.22%) from the previous session. As of 3:30 PM on this day, the won/dollar exchange rate recorded 1,507.0 won, up 7.3 won from the previous day, and the KOSDAQ closed at 1,136.64, down 22.91 points (1.98%). March 26, 2026  [Photo=Yonhap News]

The Lee Jae-myung administration officially launched on June 4, 2025.


At that time, the won/dollar exchange rate was around 1,362.09 won per dollar. However, by March 26, 2026, the won/dollar exchange rate had risen to around 1,507 won.


Compared to the inauguration, the exchange rate has risen by more than about 10%, and the external value of the won has weakened accordingly.

 

The numbers on your bank statement may remain the same.


However, the value of assets converted to dollar terms, purchasing power abroad, and resilience against import prices all decrease. This is because the exchange rate is not just a price but a measure of a currency's strength.

 

There is an even clearer point of comparison. The point when the won's value was strongest in 2025 was June 30.

 

On this day, the won/dollar exchange rate was 1,350.18 won, the lowest in 2025. Yet, in less than 9 months, the exchange rate rose back to the 1,500 won range.


This means that the won, which was briefly strong immediately after the launch, has been tilting towards structural weakness over time.

 

The 10 months of the Lee Jae-myung administration are not simply a period of temporary shock, but a time during which the won trended downwards.

 

What makes this trend even more significant is the Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER).


The Bank of Korea explains the REER as an indicator that reflects the average external real value of a currency, that is, its external purchasing power and price competitiveness, by considering exchange rates and prices with major trading partners.

 

According to recent reports, Korea's REER has fallen to 63rd place out of 64 countries. This means that the real external value of the won is effectively at the bottom tier.


This shows that the explanation "the dollar is strong, so the won had no choice but to weaken" is insufficient. This is because not all currencies weaken to this extent when facing the same external shocks.

 

Of course, there were external shocks. In March, geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, rising international oil prices, and risk aversion combined to strengthen the dollar, and risk currencies like the won were the first to be shaken.

 

Reuters reported that in late March, the won weakened to its lowest level since March 2009. The South Korean government's efforts to expand fuel tax cuts and implement market stabilization measures were also reported.


External variables were clearly the trigger. However, external shocks affect all countries. What matters is which currency is shaken more in the face of those shocks.

 

The core issue comes next. The exchange rate is both an economic indicator and a psychological indicator. The won does not weaken solely after money is released; the belief that more money will be released first depreciates the won.

 

The market does not just look at the current money supply but first prices in expectations of how much more won will be supplied in the future, how much fiscal expansion will occur, and how much currency depreciation the government will tolerate to defend the economy.

 

Indeed, the Lee Jae-myung administration passed a supplementary budget of 31.8 trillion won in July 2025, and in March 2026, a supplementary budget of around 25 trillion won was mentioned. In the foreign exchange market, such signals can be interpreted not just as a response to the economy but as a prospect that "the won could become more abundant."

 

What is important here is that the economic signals from the Lee Jae-myung administration were not unidirectional.


On the one hand, expectations of supplementary budgets and increased liquidity were read as signals weakening the scarcity of the won. On the other hand, measures to boost the stock market acted as a clear positive factor.

 

Immediately after taking office, President Lee Jae-myung launched a stock market reform drive, including encouraging dividend increases, resolving the Korea discount, amending the Commercial Act, and strictly punishing unfair transactions. The market responded positively to these measures. Reuters reported that the KOSPI rose to its highest level since January 2022 amid expectations of these reforms. The amendment of the Commercial Act in February of this year was also seen as a measure that fueled expectations for a re-evaluation of the Korean stock market.


 

Here lies a twist.

 

Signals were given to boost stocks, but the value of money actually fell. While industries held up and the stock market was boosted, the won weakened. This suggests that the market viewed the direction of currency and policy as more concerning than industries or stock prices.

 

This is precisely where the current weakening of the won can be interpreted not as a "result of weak industries" but as a "result of expectations of further money printing and policy signals eroding currency confidence." The stock market boost is not a counterargument but rather strengthens the case. This is because the won weakened despite positive developments in the asset market.

 

The National Pension Service was a major variable in understanding this trend.

 

In its 2026 asset allocation review, the National Pension Service increased its target allocation for domestic equities and decreased its target allocation for overseas equities. This is an adjustment that could structurally reduce demand for dollar purchases and act as a strengthening factor for the won.

 

Indeed, Reuters reported that following the announcement of this adjustment, the won strengthened by about 2% in a single day, and that the National Pension Service's overseas investments had been a burden on the won. In other words, the National Pension Service's return to domestic equities and strengthened currency hedging were clearly factors defending the won.

 

Despite this, the won is creating a trend of weakening. This is the core issue.

 

Industries are holding up, the government is boosting the stock market, and the National Pension Service is increasing its domestic stock allocation and strengthening currency hedging. If the won remains weak despite these factors, it indicates not just external shocks or temporary supply and demand issues, but deep market distrust of government policies.

 

This suggests that the market views the direction and sustainability of Korean policies as more precarious than the competitiveness of Korean industries. The problem is not just the amount of money, but more importantly, the trust in how that money will be managed.

 

This point aligns with the messages from the monetary authorities in the United States and Korea.

 

In January 2026, the U.S. Treasury Department stated that the weakening of the won was inconsistent with Korea's strong economic fundamentals. Governor Lee Chang-yong of the Bank of Korea also recently commented that the current won/dollar exchange rate level does not adequately reflect Korea's economic fundamentals.

 

If the currency is excessively weak compared to industries and economic fundamentals, the problem lies not so much with industrial competitiveness itself, but more with won supply and demand, liquidity expectations, policy signals, and market sentiment.

 

Ultimately, the current weakening of the won is not a result of a collapse in industrial competitiveness. If industries are holding up but the currency has collapsed first, the problem lies outside the factory, not inside.

 

Expectations of more money to be released, the accompanying supplementary budget sentiment, policy distrust that has not been overcome despite stock market boosts and the National Pension Service's return, and market sentiment that has already priced in these signals have eroded the credibility of the won.

 

The 1,500 won range for the exchange rate and the bottom tier for the REER are the results of this. While the numbers in your bank account may remain, the power of that money has diminished.

 

During the 10 months of the Lee Jae-myung administration, what the market has eroded first is not just the price of the won, but the belief in the won.



관련기사
What do you think of this article?
recommend
0
great
0
moved
0

This article has 6comments.

  • Profile
    guest2026-03-29 09:51:15

    osh1128에게,원하가치 하락의 원인에 대한 기사인데, 꼬투리 댓글이 달리네? 김영 기자를 알거나 스스로 경제 좀 안다고 나데고 싶은 모양이네? 한글 독해력이 떨어지는 자가 경제를 ㅎㅎㅎ.

  • Profile
    hmj2026-03-28 13:34:08

    반도체로 그나마 벌고 있으니 그나마 이정도죠. 그것마저 금이가면 상상하기도 끔찍한 상황이 올까봐 두렵습니다.

  • Profile
    hmj2026-03-28 13:32:46

    그러나 이번에는 외국인이 추가로 한국주식을 사지 않았는데 주가는 단기간에 2.5배 올라버렸습니다.
    외국인의 한국주식 시가총액이 1조 달러가 넘죠.
    김영기자님이 외국인 투자자라 라면 한국주식 100달러 환전해서 샀는데 단기간에 지금 250달러가 돼 있다면
    조금씩 분할해서 팔지 않겠는지요. 저라면 조금씩 팔것 같습니다. 요즘 외국인 매일 1조~3조원 정도씩 팔잖아요. 이 상황에서 원화가치가 좋아질 수 없는거죠.

  • Profile
    hmj2026-03-28 11:53:21

    김영기자의 기사에 대부분 동의하지만 이번기사는 동의하기가 좀 어렵네요
    osh1128님이 말씀 하셨듯이 내수부분은 지금 극한의 불황에 접어든것 같습니다.
    1998년 주식시장을 100% 외국인에게 개방한 이래 외국인은 한국의 외환보유고 +- 20% 이상 한국에 투자하지
    않았습니다. 한국주식을 팔고 나갈때의 환전을 염두에 둔 투자이지요.

  • Profile
    osh11282026-03-28 07:26:43

    산업이 강하다니?
    주가지수만 오르면 산업이 강한 것인가?
    지금 중소기업과 자영업자들은 정말 너무 힘들어하고 있다.
    분석? 월 알고나 분석하는 것인가?

  • Profile
    osh11282026-03-28 07:24:52

    김영 기자는 산업이 버텼다고 했지만, 현실은 반도체 분야 외에는 모두 생사의 갈림길에 서있다.
    또 상법개정을 시장이 긍정적으로 받아드렸다고 했는데, 이건 무슨 개풀 뜯어먹는 소리인가?
    한국경제는 지금 파산 일보 직전이다. 반도체만 삐끗하면 바로 파산이다. 다른 것은 정부가 어떻게 막아도 환율은 막을 수가 없기 때문에 드러난 것이다.
    경제도 모르는 사람이 경제기사를 쓰니 이런 헛소리가 나오는 것이라 본다.

정기구독배너
Go to Mobile Site