기사 메일전송
Allowance at the level of annual salary… Even attending one meeting per month, the election committee chairman's allowance alone amounts to 37.8 million won annually.
  • Lim Yo-hee
  • June 11, 2026 at 2:26 AM
기사수정

National Election Commission in Gwacheon, Gyeonggi Province. [Photo = Yonhap News]

It has been found that the activity fees and allowances received by National Election Commissioners (non-standing honorary positions) exceed 2 million won per month.

 

Seoul Shinmun reported on the 10th, "Due to the secrecy of the Election Commission, the public cannot verify whether they attend work or access meeting minutes, yet the monthly allowances are paid consistently."

 

According to the National Election Commission Act, the 8 non-standing commissioners, including the chairman, among the current 9 commissioners, are not allowed to receive salaries from the Election Commission. Instead, they are paid daily and actual expenses for performing certain duties, such as election-related tasks.

 

The Chairman of the National Election Commission receives 2.9 million won per month under the name of "Public Election Promotion Activity Allowance," and 150,000 won each time they attend a meeting as an attendance allowance. Additionally, an allowance of 100,000 won is paid for each agenda item reviewed. This amounts to at least 37.8 million won annually. The National Election Commissioners receive 2.15 million won per month for the "Public Election Promotion Activity Allowance," which is 750,000 won less than the chairman.

 

The report quoted an official from the Election Commission as saying, "As a principle, regular monthly meetings are held once a month, except for special circumstances such as during election periods."

 

The Board of Audit and Inspection has requested corrective action five times from 2019 to 2023 regarding the practice of paying monthly fixed allowances to the National Election Commission, stating that there is no legal basis for it.

 

The Ministry of Economy and Finance has also advised all government ministries through its detailed guidelines for budget preparation and fund management plans to refrain from calculating monthly attendance fees for non-standing members.

 

According to the report, the National Election Commission temporarily suspended the payment of the "Public Election Promotion Activity Allowance" from January 2023. However, it resumed payments after the National Election Commission Act was amended in 2024 to include provisions allowing for the payment of allowances "within the budget scope."

 

Some argue that it is inappropriate to pay monthly fixed allowances when the activities of non-standing commissioners are not transparently disclosed.

 

Han Sang-hee, Emeritus Professor at Konkuk University Law School, pointed out, "There is a lack of knowledge and understanding regarding election management," and stated, "It is necessary to create an open governance system within the Election Commission, along with an audit body."

 

Netizens left comments such as, "Is President Yoon's action correct? Martial law was the only way to check the omnipotent Election Commission," "There is a need to thoroughly investigate the Election Commission's servers, etc.," and "The Election Commission should be dissolved and the system reset."


Reporter Lim Yo-hee


관련기사
What do you think of this article?
recommend
0
great
0
moved
0

This article has 3comments.

  • Profile
    ENSKim33162026-06-12 03:13:47

    한국인들은 스스로 자신들의 국민으로의 권리를 포기했다.
    박근혜 탄핵이 바로 그것이다. 당시 한국인들은 깨인사람, 멋있는 사람, 잘난 사람, 머리좋은 사람들의 대열에서 행여 탈락될가봐 너도 나도 박근혜 탄핵의 기치를 높이 들고 광화문 광장에서 온갖 병신 춤을 추며 지랄발광 쑈를 벌렸고 그 인간 들 중 지금 잠실 등 부정선거 규탄모임에 나와 악을 쓰고 있는 저 사람들 중 일부도 끼어있었을 것이다. 당신들은 이미 모든 것을 잃었다는 것을 인식하고 잃어진 나라를 적으로부터 되찾아 다시 세워야 한다는 각오로 임하기 바란다. 미국더러 제국주의 침략자라느니 점령군이라느니 개수작 늘어 놓던 때가 바로 어젠데 무슨 쪽제비 낯짝으로 미국이 와서 어떻게 좀 안해주나 하고 미국 눈치만 보고들 있는지 그것도 참 신기하다. 당시 박근혜 탄핵과 한국인들 사이에 만연해 있던 반미친중을 반대하던 나같은 7080 늙은이들을 향해 "깨이지 못한 늙은이들"이라고 욕하던 입에서 어떻게 지금와서 미국타령이 나오는가?
    더구나 박대통령 사기탄핵시 박대통령과 대한민국은 함께 생매장하던 관 뚜껑에 마지막 못질을 했던 황교안 따위가 감히 어디 나와서 주둥이를 놀리는지도 기가차다. 이재명에게 물러봐도 부정선거는 나쁘다고 할 것이다. 단지 이재명은 6.3 선거가 부정선거가 아니라고 말하고 있을 뿐이다. 겨우 부정선거를 비난한다고 황교안을 보수우파라고 받아들이기는 어렵다. 황교안은 박근혜 대통령 사기탄핵에 대한 너의 입장부터 밝히기 바란다.

  • Profile
    guest2026-06-11 09:18:44

    이 돈에 눈이 멀어서 부정선거를 묵인하고 은폐하고 범죄자들을 풀어주었는가?

  • Profile
    hursan72026-06-11 08:06:14

    한마디로 허가난 도둑놈들이다,부정선거 저지르고 뒤에서는 연봉을 따로 받고?
    판사라는 작자들이 양심은 엇다 팔아먹고 범죄질을 눈감으며 세금까지 착취?
    이번엔 사법부 부정선거 관련자들도 사형으로 본보기를 보여야한다,
    페르샤왕 캄비세스는 법을 팔아먹은 세삼네스 판사를 산채로 껍질을 벗겨 후임인
    아들 판사의 의자에 씌우도록 처벌했다,차라리 사형이 낫지 않겠는가?

정기구독배너
Go to Mobile Site