[Statement by the Seo-beo-kka Korea Military Academy Save-the-Nation Comrades Association] ㉛ Recount the Votes Publicly, as the Previous Recount Concealed Election Fraud
Tongyeong Mayoral Election Recount [Photo=Yonhap News]South Korea's liberal democracy is dying. The National Election Commission (NEC) and the judiciary, which have plummeted into criminal syndicates
What is the significance of the "Trump 2028" red hats that keep making a comeback?
It is noteworthy that President Donald Trump is "intentionally" fueling controversy over whether he can actually run in the 2028 presidential election, even though it is "highly likely he is seriously
Jin Cummings: “North Korea says it will increase the number of spies, so what is the government doing?”
U.S. political columnist Gene Cummings has publicly questioned the South Korean government, asking, "North Korea is declaring that it will increase its number of spies, so what is the South Kore
“Too little, too late?…” Kim Moon-soo, who previously conceded his presidential election defeat, now demands a special counsel investigation into ‘allegations of election fraud in the 2025 presidential election’
People Power Party presidential candidate Kim Moon-soo concedes defeat during a press conference at the party headquarters in Yeouido, Seoul, on June 4, 2025. [Joint Press Corps]As allegations emerge
Stock Market Crash 'Black Tuesday'… KOSPI down 10.8%, KOSDAQ down 7.7%
The KOSPI fell by more than 5% in early trading on the 28th, triggering a sell-side sidecar.On the 28th, the KOSPI plunged by more than 10%.Due to the sharp decline, a sell-side sidecar—a temporary
[World Heritage Committee] 25 New World Heritage Sites Inscribed in Busan… South Korea Successfully Expands 'Getbol' Listing
The Chairperson of the World Heritage Committee speaks at the plenary session of the 48th session of the World Heritage Committee, held at BEXCO in Busan on the 20th. [Photo: Yonhap News]A total of 25
[Liberal Democratic Party Statement] Calling it a Grand Real Estate Debate… It Was Nothing More Than a Private Party Among Themselves
The 'National Grand Debate on Real Estate Policy' held on July 23rd and 27th. [Photo=Yonhap News]The 'National Grand Debate on Real Estate Policy,' hosted by the Lee Jae-myung administration under the
Protesters in front of the Supreme Court [AFP Yonhap News]
U.S. President Donald Trump attended the Federal Supreme Court in Washington D.C. on the 1st (local time), where oral arguments were held on his "executive order to ban birthright citizenship."
President Trump attended the oral arguments taking place at the Supreme Court starting at 10 a.m. today. The attendance of a sitting U.S. president at the Supreme Court is unprecedented.
Previously, President Trump announced in November last year that he would participate in Supreme Court arguments in a lawsuit related to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which served as the basis for imposing reciprocal tariffs, but withdrew at the last minute.
In that lawsuit, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in February that President Trump's imposition of reciprocal tariffs and tariffs on fentanyl based on IEEPA was illegal.
Trump's decision to break with tradition and attend the Supreme Court today appears to be driven by concerns of political damage if he loses this lawsuit as well.
Birthright citizenship is a right stipulated in the U.S. Constitution, which states, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to its jurisdiction, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
However, President Trump issued an executive order immediately after taking office in January of last year, prohibiting birthright citizenship for children born to parents who are in the U.S. illegally or who do not have permanent residency.
President Trump has argued that the original intent of birthright citizenship was to grant citizenship to slaves and their children after the Civil War, not for wealthy Chinese individuals giving birth in the U.S. or for illegal immigrants in the U.S.
This reversed established policies and legal interpretations, and it drew backlash because it could strip the nationality of hundreds of thousands to millions of children born to immigrant parents.
Ultimately, 22 states, led by Democratic governors, and Washington D.C. filed lawsuits, claiming the executive order was unconstitutional, and lower courts ruled in favor of the plaintiffs.
If the birthright citizenship ban executive order is also ruled unconstitutional, following the illegal tariff ruling, it would be a series of blows for President Trump, leading to the interpretation that he intends to pressure the justices by attending the Supreme Court in person.
The ban on birthright citizenship, along with President Trump's policy of deporting illegal immigrants and his push for a bill requiring voter ID at the polls (known as the 'SAVE' Act), is also seen as an attempt to diminish the vote-getting power of Democratic candidates in the midterm elections.
However, President Trump did not speak directly in court. Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Sauer, representing the executive branch, answered the justices' questions.
Deputy Assistant Attorney General Sauer argued that citizenship should be granted not merely based on being born in the United States, but also by considering the legality of the parents' stay and their loyalty to the American political system.
The justices questioned the government's logic, centering on the 1898 "Wong Kim Ark" precedent, which recognized the citizenship of a child born in San Francisco to Chinese parents.
In this context, they also asked about the government's position on the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, which states that "all persons born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction are citizens." It was also pointed out that recognizing the authority of the U.S. political system and its laws and institutions would be sufficient.
The Supreme Court ruling is expected this summer. Current projections from U.S. media largely suggest that President Trump does not have a high probability of winning.
In front of the Supreme Court, where the oral arguments were held today, protesters, estimated to include immigrant families from Korea, gathered to urge a ruling against President Trump's executive order.
Vehicle of President Trump arriving at the Supreme Court [AFP Yonhap News]
Yonhap News More by this author
This article has 4comments.
안녕하세요, hursan7님, 조금 시일이 걸릴 것 같습니다. 어제 아침 서버업체에 요청을 했는데 아직 회신이 없습니다. 이런 경우가 처음이어서요, 추정하기로는 단순 디자인이나 모듈을 바꾸는 간편한 작업이 아닌 것으로 보입니다. 다시 문의해보겠습니다. 조금은 더 시일이 걸릴 수 있을 것 같습니다. 문의 감사합니다.
한미일보가 어제 댓글수 제한 조치를 시정한다고 약속했는데 아직
고쳐지지 않고 있습니다,써버관리 업체의 잘못인지 궁금합니다,
2)한 이민원칙을 지켜 불법이민 범죄자들로부터 미국 국민을 지키고 부정선거 범죄로 이용되는 시민권자
자격을 엄격하게 제한하려는 트럼프 대통령의 정책이 심하게 부딪치고 있다고 본다,
시민권자의 자격 여부의 판단은 미국자유민주 체제의 존립자체를 판단하는 매우 중요한 문제다,
하므로 미 대법원은 자유민주 체제의 상징인 선거를 이들 미자격 시민권자를 이용해 부정선거로
권력을 탈취하는 범죄집단으로 부터 막으려는 트럼프 대통령의 뜻을 반드시 존중해야만 할것이다,
1)문제의 본질은 미 민주당이 선거에서 유리한 결과를 얻으려고 불법범죄자
입국이나 이민을 무차별적으로 허용했다는 사실이다,아무리 정치적
목적을 위한다지만 불법밀입국자까지 받아들인다는건 엄연히 정치적 범죄다,
아울러 이런 거시적인 정치목적은 역시 부정선거를 이용하여 범죄를 세탁하는
집단의 권력탈취에 목적이있다,무슨 수를 써서라도 미국에 자리잡아 살려는
각국 이민희망자들과 미국 민주당과는 한마디로 똥짝이 잘 맞고 미국 헌법에 의