Attorney Park Joo-hyun speaking at the Olympic Park Handball Gymnasium in Jamsil on the night of the 3rd. [Attorney Park Joo-hyun YouTube GIF] 

A subtle new front is emerging among right-wing citizens who have packed the area around Seoul’s Olympic Park, which has recently become a sanctuary for “uncovering election fraud,” to the point where there is barely room to move. 

Concerns are growing among citizens as internal divisions deepen over disputes regarding calls for an investigation into the Association of World Election Bodies (A-WEB), power plays, heated verbal exchanges among YouTubers, and the controversy surrounding “Jahyeok-mori” (the act of labeling and harassing people as members of the Freedom and Innovation Party).

Attorney Park Joo-hyun, who has been at the forefront of uncovering the truth about election fraud, visited the area around the Olympic Park Handball Gymnasium on the night of the 3rd for a YouTube live stream. When asked by citizens about the “fracturing of the right wing,” he explained, “Division and conflict are part of the process for democracy to mature.” 

He stated, “Division does not automatically mean ruin, and since the rise and fall of movements depend on how they navigate these processes, we should not necessarily avoid them just because they occur.” He appealed for understanding across the right-wing community, which views the issues from various perspectives, and urged for “mature acceptance.” 

Putting the Brakes on Misguided ‘Jahyeok-mori’… “A-WEB is an Election Fraud Campaign Led by Mijung-gal”

On this day, the site saw a concentration of debate over placards calling for an international investigation into A-WEB and questions regarding so-called “Jahyeok-mori.” This is because some YouTubers and citizens had raised suspicions that the slogan might be a political maneuver by a specific party (the Freedom and Innovation Party).

In response, Attorney Park gestured toward Gate 2-1 of the Handball Gymnasium, where the “A-WEB international investigation” slogans and placards were concentrated, and systematically refuted these misunderstandings.

He began by saying, “In fact, the A-WEB slogan is not a slogan of the Freedom and Innovation Party.” He added, “It is a campaign by ‘Mijung-gal’ (US Politics Gallery), a group of friends who are working very hard to uncover election fraud. Even Chairman Hwang Kyo-ahn (of the Freedom and Innovation Party) talks about ‘election fraud and re-elections,’ but he does not use the slogan ‘A-WEB election fraud.’” 

He further pointed out, “Of course, it is true that he (Chairman Hwang) believes A-WEB must be dismantled and investigated, but the claim that the Freedom and Innovation Party itself is leading this is fundamentally wrong.” 

“The Right Wing Fails the Moment It Aims for the Center… Hiding Facts is a Left-Wing Tactic”

A citizen present at the scene asked, “I agree with their intentions, but elections and voting rights are not just issues for the right wing—they are issues for all citizens. If we excessively expand the agenda (to A-WEB), won't we lose mass appeal?” 

Attorney Park clearly drew a line, stating that the winning equations for the right and left are completely different, and replied firmly. 

He emphasized, “As I said recently, the way the right wins and the way the left wins are different. To win, the left must aim for the center, but for the right to win, it must champion strong ideologies and strong facts.” He continued, “President Reagan and President Trump spoke of a strong right wing, and (President Trump) discusses the facts of election fraud. Those who advocate for this should not compromise. Because we are fighting with truth and for the truth, it is important to expose more facts and enlighten the public.” 

Regarding the repeated concerns that the intensity should be dialed back for national expansion, Attorney Park criticized the sentiment, saying, “The idea that we must hide the essence of election fraud to inform more people is cowardly.”

He declared, “That is not expansion, but rather contraction. The right wing fails the moment it aims for the center. You must realize that hiding facts and creating pretexts to aim for the center are tactics used by the left. Saying we should only call for re-elections to gather more people? That is a truly wrong approach—it’s a trick created by the left, just like when Lee Jun-seok says we should only talk about re-elections.” 

Attorney Park Joo-hyun explained, “I also told (those calling for an A-WEB international investigation) to match the tone of others, but they decided to proceed (as they were). But isn’t that valid? If we listen and empathize with why these people are shouting, this voice could become the voice of the whole; if we fail to empathize, that voice will simply fade away (under the surface). That is the method of democracy we accept.” 

He added repeatedly, “Isn’t it correct (to talk about A-WEB)? They are indeed the main culprits of international election fraud. Therefore, we cannot stop them from trying to inform others. Speaking up is a natural freedom, and I believe this is the right way because, through it, mutual compromise can be reached.” 

However, he pointed out that excessive methods—such as rejecting others' arguments as if judging them—can exacerbate problems regardless of which side they come from.

When another citizen raised the issue, saying, “Some people ask, ‘Why aren’t you talking about A-WEB? You’re not the real deal,’” he firmly stated, “That is wrong,” and warned, “It is no different from those who tell people not to talk about A-WEB; both are wrong behaviors.” 

A-WEB flag flying at Olympic Park [Hanmi Ilbo]

“Spies and Infiltrators Likely Operating in Olympic Park… We Need Mature Sublimation to Prevent Internal Conflict”

As the conversation deepened, the atmosphere on site naturally shifted toward reorganization and solidarity within the right wing. When another citizen expressed that their heart was hurt and their motivation sapped by the division within the right, Attorney Park awakened vigilance by mentioning the possibility of dark forces behind it. 

He suggested, “There are those who seek division. There are disguised ‘Jahyeok’ party members (with malicious intent to start fights) and there are likely a great number of spies here at Olympic Park. Since there are forces that induce and incite conflict, we must process this well. We need to go through a stage of sublimating this process in a more mature way.” 

Specifically, he added, “When people gather, thoughts cannot all be the same. The way is to listen to the stories, and if they sound reasonable, accept them. Isn’t that how the slogan became ‘Election Fraud, Re-election’?” He continued, “But if you keep hearing about A-WEB and cannot empathize with it, then just don’t do it. Labeling the other side as a spy or an infiltrator is the wrong behavior.” 

When a citizen asked, “I think it’s time for a reorganization,” Attorney Park replied, “We must keep talking and find common ground. Among them, there might be real infiltrators or other operatives, so we must also watch carefully. That is why if we are not mature, we become puppets swept away by their schemes. We shouldn’t go under like Hong Kong, should we?” 

Upon hearing the answer, one citizen remarked, “I was depressed for a few weeks, but I’ve come to think that this is an unavoidable process.” 

“Hwang Kyo-ahn is a Leader Who is Consistent Through and Through… The People Power Party Covers Up Election Fraud Because Many Are Complicit” 

During the live broadcast, Attorney Park also offered his opinion on the controversy surrounding Chairman Hwang Kyo-ahn and Representative Jeon Han-gil, whose assessments vary within the pan-right camp. 

He urged mutual respect, saying, “You can critique, but you shouldn't condemn. We must avoid expressing condemnation or conflict toward one another. If you condemn, even things that could work out will fail.” 

He expressed deep trust in Chairman Hwang Kyo-ahn. Attorney Park described Hwang as a leader who is “the same front and back,” saying, “Most people, when exposed over a long period, eventually have their true nature and capabilities revealed, leading to mistakes or showing sides different from what appeared on screen, but Chairman Hwang has none of that, so he is someone you can trust. I believe he is the most dedicated and sincere person regarding election fraud.” 

Regarding Chairman Hwang Kyo-ahn and Representative Jang Dong-hyuk, he offered indirect criticism: “I wish they would fill each other’s gaps. If I were Representative Jang, I would appoint Chairman Hwang to the special counsel position; that isn't difficult, but it isn't being done.” 

He added, “Actually, if you look at it coldly, it seems the People Power Party is trying to block it because there are too many people involved in the election fraud. They call it ‘poor management’ and don’t talk about ‘election fraud,’ do they? We must look at the big picture.” 

Attorney Park Joo-hyun has repeatedly made it clear that he is not a member of any specific political party. 

Beyond Attorney Park, many patriotic citizens who visit Olympic Park align with the Freedom and Innovation Party. Since the Freedom and Innovation Party is the only domestic party to have adopted the eradication of election fraud as a party platform, their actions can be seen as aligned in the pursuit of uncovering the truth. 

Looking into the Background of Why the Term ‘Hong Gil-dong Party’ Emerged…

It follows the logic that people gather at soccer stadiums because they like soccer, and at concert venues because they like a singer. To the accusation that anyone who claims there should be an international investigation is a member of the Freedom and Innovation Party, the members themselves retort: Are the 30,000 people gathered at a soccer stadium all working for the same company, living in the same place, and knowing each other? Their point is that the logic that anyone with a ‘Stop the Steal’ sticker on their phone is a party member is pathetic. 

Likewise, citizens who are not party members but call for an A-WEB investigation argue that they are coming to Olympic Park to shout for an international investigation and strive to inform the truth because America's help is desperately needed to root out a massive international election fraud cartel—not because they are party members. They lament, asking how a wren can understand the will of a stork. It is like crying out in frustration, asking how someone who is only at the first level of “enlightenment” could possibly understand those at the black-belt level. From the perspective of 10 levels of enlightenment, the first level is not much different from the left wing. 

Conversely, those who wish to support party activities by joining the Freedom and Innovation Party—the only party that has made the eradication of election fraud a party platform—are quite angry at the tendency to dismissively label them. It is a common-sense pushback that joining and participating in a party that is honest and clear in its conservative ideology, out of disillusionment with the dishonest and immoral mainstream political landscape, is a freedom of political expression guaranteed by the Constitution and should never be the target of condemnation. Their stance is that the concern that “politics has tainted the Jamsil struggle” is aimed at the wrong address. 

The context for the term “Hong Gil-dong Party” is similar. Like Hong Gil-dong, who could not call his father “father,” they are left speechless by the ignorant bravery of those who see election statistics that are inexplicably favorable to the left and offline evidence, yet insist on calling it “poor management” as if there were not even a shred of doubt. The term “Hong Gil-dong Party” satirizes a party that cannot call “election fraud” by its name, and this criticism arises from the logical and reasonable belief that they are not actually ignorant, but have instead participated in the catastrophic crime of election fraud. 

Even if a special counsel is appointed, they ask if we can really trust the results of a match where the judiciary—the very institution that symbolizes one axis of the election fraud cartel—serves as the referee. They provide empirical examples, stating that if the judiciary had been normal from the start, President Yoon Suk-yeol would not have been sentenced to life imprisonment (in a hypothetical scenario). They retort, asking if it is common sense to rely on a judiciary that has already been captured—along with the media, the legislature, and the executive branch. They pour out their anger, asking if we have already forgotten the painful distrust of the judiciary brought upon the conservative right by Moon Hyung-bae and Ji Gwi-yeon. This is why, even while shouting “Yoon Again,” they sigh heavily at the sentiment of those who jump on the bandwagon of “Jahyeok-mori,” asking if that isn't proof that “old-school politics” has tainted the movement.